Covering what’s really going on in Bristol
Powered by 2,000 members
The Bristol Cable

Following controversy over use of public money for Green Capital, Alec Saelens and Joe Smith chatted with people concerned, seeking transparency about how the money had been distributed.

On December 20th 2014 The Bristol Cable ran a story online showing that out of 32 Strategic Grants awarded by Bristol 2015 Ltd, 10 had gone to organisations with personal and professional links to the Bristol 2015 Board of Directors

Some Background

June 2013

Bristol wins title of European Green Capital 2015

Feb 2014

Private company, Bristol 2015 Ltd is set up to run the year with £1.2m council money.

Apr 2014

Treasury pledges £7m to Bristol to help run green capital, £2m are for grants.

Nov 2014

Local charities & community groups invited to bid for £1.35m worth of Strategic Grants from Bristol 2015 Ltd. 186 applications are made.

Dec 2014

The Council Cabinet agrees a list of 32 recommendations for Strategic Grants drawn up Bristol 2015 Ltd.

George Ferguson, Mayor of Bristol and Board member of Bristol 2015 Ltd, emailed us saying it was an ‘outrageous’ article ‘simply designed to cause maximum discontent.’ Helen Bell from Bristol 2015’s PR team also got in touch to say Board members ‘had no involvement whatsoever in reviewing or judging the applications for strategic grants.’ Both felt we’d reported the situation unfairly. George Ferguson also felt our push to publish before Grants were officially announced hadn’t left him sufficient time to respond.

We initially wrote that story in order to raise public awareness of potential conflicts of interest surrounding the handing out of £1.35m public money in Strategic Grants, and to shed light on the process at a time when information was hard to find in the public domain.

In order to clarify the facts we recently went to a meeting with Bristol 2015 Ltd. where we spoke to Helen Bell, Chair of the Board Andrew Garrad, and Board member and Chair of Green Capital Partnership Liz Ziegler. We were told Board members

“were appointed because they are leaders in their respective fields and are therefore connected to some of the key sustainability organisations in Bristol.”

In total we found 13 Strategic Grants totalling over £574,000 had gone to organisations with links to Bristol 2015 staff . However we were told that the selection process kept the decision-making “at arm’s length” from board members and their interests. Once bid applications were submitted to Bristol 2015 Ltd they were channelled through for external review from KPMG (multinational accounting firm) as well as legal and finance advisers within the Council before getting to an Assessment Panel.

The key to the independence of this process was the 3 person Assessment Panel, chosen and appointed by Bristol 2015, which Helen Bell said

“was made up of impartial Council officers and external experts – there were no elected members, Board members or Bristol 2015 employees involved.”

A conflicted Assessment Panel

We had to ask Bristol 2015 Ltd. to get all the names of the three Independent Assessment Panel members, but after doing some research we discovered that panellist Jim Longhurst works at UWE as Associate Dean of the Faculty of Environment and Technology- the same Faculty which the Panel recommended for a grant of £50,000, and Anna Farthing is a Director of Bristol Festivals which also got £50,000.

Zoe Sear, Marketing and Communications Director for Bristol 2015 Ltd, said:

“A register of conflicts of interests for the Panel was recorded throughout the assessment. The process was overseen by a Project Manager […] in The Mayor’s Office to ensure that it was fair, consistent and robust.”

Flow of However, with access to the ‘Register of conflicts of interests’ of the Panel we realised that Jim Longhurst’ status was only an ‘Employee of UWE’, whilst his Faculty’s £50,000 project was not even included in his list of 18 potential conflicts of interest.  Anna Farthing’s position within Bristol Festivals is acknowledged as ‘Board Member’, but the organisation’s bid for Strategic Funding is omitted from her list. For his part, the third panelist Alex Minshull put forward 9 projects for which he may be conflicted. We asked Jim Longhurst and Anna Farthing for comment, but at the time of going to print, we were still waiting for their responses.

Fair enough if the board had links to bidding organisations, but the Assessment Panel too? Is it so hard to find three people in Bristol qualified to judge these grant applications who don’t also work for organisations applying for grants?

Andrew Garrad responded that normal conflict of interest procedures would have been followed by the independent Assessment Panel. Stephen Wray the Council’s Project Manager who oversaw the bid review process said

“the two panel members absented themselves from the room during the discussions on those applications that I identified as constituting a conflict of interest.”

However, considering the Register of conflicts of interests clearly overlooked two cases- questions remain over the thoroughness of the process.

 

In a meeting with George Ferguson, we asked him to clarify this situation. We put it to him that if the Assessment Panel were awarding money to organisations they worked for, surely this constituted a conflict of interest? He replied:

“I honestly don’t know, it’s the first time I’ve heard that. […] If that was true, that is so. I was not involved at all in the appointing of the members of the selection panel.”

We then asked Mark Brain, Chair of Bristol Council’s Audit Committee, (which oversees Council spending) if he had seen Bristol 2015 Ltd.’s books. He replied:

“The Audit Committee does not have responsibility for oversight of the company’s finances only the contribution of resources by Bristol City Council to it and only then from the perspective of governance and risk. Bristol 2015 Ltd. will have its own audit arrangements.”

Bristol 2015 Ltd. is a private company set up with £1.2m of public money, so-far it has spent £1.1m of that – including £200,000 on developing a website. It has been tasked with distributing a further £7m of public money over 2015. It seems remarkable that Bristol 2015 Ltd. is not obliged to make its full accounts available to scrutiny by the public or elected officials.

 

Strategic Grants£1,500,000


Small Grants

£250,000


Neighbourhood Grants

£250,000


(Total Grants)

£2,000,000

Summits and Conferences

£1,196,543


Green Tech Festival

£639,063


City Arts Programme

£394,315


Bristol Method

£387,517


Volunteers Programme

£271,942


Schools Programme

£1,087,766


Total
£5,977,146′

What impact on Bristol’s community groups?

Councillors have repeatedly raised issues regarding the inclusivity of Green Capital and the short time span for applying to Strategic funding in particular. In a public meeting in October Labour Cllr Margaret Hickman said:

“There are people who don’t know how to fill in grant application forms, there are organisations that don’t have bank accounts. If we’re really serious about Green Capital impacting on people it hasn’t reached before, we need to address this.”

She went on to say that Green Capital would not be ‘game changing’ for Bristol unless greater efforts were made to steer the programme towards peripheral communities.

Green Cllr Rob Telford said

“ Questions have been asked about the funding arrangements and the membership of the independent panel, and that is not the best start to our Green Capital year which I think Bristolians really want to get behind.”

 

Ashley Community Housing were denied funding for an inner city gardening project with disadvantaged people. The group’s business manager Richard Thickpenny said

“we obviously feel disappointed our innovative project was overlooked in favour of projects which seem to have significantly less impact.”

From the perspective of unsuccessful grant applicants there are persistent  questions to be asked regarding the process and outcome. Steve Glover of the Severn Project, told the Bristol Cable

“we are bitterly disappointed – not for ourselves but for the city. […] It would seem that more transparency is needed, and we would call on those responsible to provide the information that would put a stop to the claims of favouritism.”

Whilst much smaller funding streams were also available it remains to be seen how much money from the Strategic Grants fund will reach Bristol’s more marginal communities (see our Inclusion article). As a private company dealing with large sums of public money, it is important that Bristol 2015 Ltd is seen to be transparent and accountable to elected officials and the public.

Public interest journalism is expensive, takes time and can be risky.

But powering Bristol’s media co-op isn’t.

Join the Cable

Read more on: bristol city council, george ferguson, green capital, public money

Comments

Report a comment

  • Chris Martin says:

    A good summary of where we are. There obviously remains various unanswered questions – which includes the report that was commissioned on the ‘governance problems’ with Bristol 2015 Ltd that cost the Bristol taxpayer £8700. However, the report will not be published (as an FOI discovered) because the council agreed to confidentiality! When taxpayers pay for something that results in an outcome such as a report there should be NO confidentiality enforced as a reason for avoiding transparency.

    The article quotes both Green and Labour cllrs but consistently the most vocal (and consequently denounced party) with their questioning has been the Liberal Democrats who won the bid in the first place. Consistent requests that resulted in the organisation of a demonstration calling for publication of all the accounts for which they met the usual outrageously offensive broadside from a very defensive mayor Ferguson – calling us failed politicians and lunatics.

    Let us be very clear – money came from Government to BCC – in another FOI it is made clear by DECC (Depart of Energy, Climate Change) that the money was NOT transferred to Bristol 2015 Ltd. So £7m is accountable to the public via Bristol City Council and subject therefore to FOIs. WHY therefore has the council repeatedly denied FOIs on the money citing the line that this money is not subject to FOI because Bristol 2015 is a private company. For the money to be remitted to Bristol 2015 an invoice must have been raised. Therefore, a clear audit line must be available for scrutiny of monies being remitted against invoices. Furthermore, it is made clear in the Purchasing Policy of Bristol 2015 that any sums above £50 must be applied for with a purchase order. These purchase orders would form a collective sum embodied in any invoice sent to BCC for remittance from the £7m. It is quite clear that the information and data on expenditure exists and further obstruction, resistance to requests for full transparent publication of line by line accounts (everything about £50) only serves to reinforce the conclusion that there is something to conceal and that we rightly should all be suspicious of their denial of access to the data.

    A petition has been set up calling for full publication and can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/hasb5c2

  • Rob Wilkinson says:

    Wrong information from Christian Martin. The lie dems did not win the money in the first place they came second in the previous application.

    The green capital award came under George Ferguson. Let’s stick to facts.

    • Ralph Kasper says:

      How ironic that Rob Wilkinson says ‘let’s stick to facts’ whilst telling a blatant lie.

      Bristol not winning Green Capital the first time around is completely unrelated to the £7m grant, which WAS secured by Stephen Williams, as confirmed by Danny Alexander when he announced the grant.

      And since you allude to who helped us win, the bid (and associated work) was actually done when the Lib Dems were in charge, which had been confirmed in writing by Council officers. Just because the result was announced after George had taken over doesn’t mean that he won it for Bristol.

City Reports

“Underhand and sneaky”: Plutus Energy plan new power station

Features City

Bristol’s invisible killer

Reports City Voices

Green Capital? 2015 was “extremely difficult”, says Bristol wind power CEO

Ideas And Action Reports Co-op Community

The Bristol Post just stooped to a new low. Here’s why…

Reports

Green Capital finances can’t take scrutiny?

Reports

“Probably carcinogenic” chemicals, but will the council dither?

Powered by members

If you like our work, join us. For as little as £1 / month.

Join now