Our journalism needs your support! Become a member
The Bristol Cable

An end to blind eyes around human trafficking?

In a potentially groundbreaking case, Bristol council has taken responsibility for the welfare of a trafficked woman. Will it signal a change?


In a potentially groundbreaking case, Bristol council has taken responsibility for the welfare of a trafficked woman. Will it signal a change?

In a landmark case brought by local human rights law firm, Deighton Pierce Glynn, Bristol council recently accepted that it is responsible for the welfare of a trafficking victim who was brought to the UK for sexual exploitation and was facing homelessness and destitution on the streets of Bristol.

Human trafficking is a form of modern slavery whereby people are brought into the country through force or deception, usually for purposes of forced labour or sexual exploitation.

After denying any duty to support the claimant for the last six months – who the court has ordered cannot be identified – the council backed down only days before the case was due to be heard in the High Court and agreed to provide accommodation and support to her until she is able to move to suitable accommodation.

The risk of re-­trafficking

As a citizen of the European Economic Area (the EU plus certain other European states such as Norway) the claimant can only access vital welfare benefits if she is working and was unable to work while she was recovering from her trafficking ordeal. The claimant could not return to her country of origin to access support there because of the risk of re-trafficking that she would face on return.

Under international law the UK government is required to consider granting leave to remain to trafficking victims who may need to stay in the UK because of their personal circumstances, or if they are helping the police to investigate their traffickers. However it routinely does not do this for EEA citizens, on the grounds that they’re able to work if they want to remain here.

But for many trafficked people – mentally or physically scarred by their experience – that is not possible. Often they are extremely vulnerable, having been subjected to months or years of abuse and conditioning by their traffickers. Without documents or any money, they are at significant risk of being re-­trafficked by criminals. Some may even actively seek to renew contact with their traffickers, as the only people they know and can turn to.

“In the case against Bristol council, the claimant faced a stark choice between street homelessness and destitution, or returning to her country of origin to face almost certain re-­trafficking”

In the case against Bristol council, the claimant faced a stark choice between street homelessness and destitution, or returning to her country of origin to face almost certain re­-trafficking. In these circumstances, her lawyers argued that the council should step in to provide support and accommodation to prevent her becoming homeless or being re-trafficked. This was on the grounds that the council’s failures to act would have been in breach of the duties owed to trafficking victims under human rights legislation.
“After the government identifies someone as a victim of trafficking, there is a duty on the state to support and protect them from being re­trafficked,” Adam Hundt, a partner at Deighton Pierce Glynn, tells the Cable. “But there are serious gaps in the safety net for many victims, particularly those from EEA states. After the formal identification process is completed, safe­house accommodation and subsistence support is cut off completely, and no provision has been made by the government for local authorities to support individuals in these circumstances.

“The human rights safeguards, which we argued should apply in this case, are meant to be a very last resort to stop people from starving in the street and it has taken a hard­-fought battle to get the council to agree to this,” he adds. “It shouldn’t have to be this way”.

A mixed picture

Despite the creation in 2009 of the Avon and Somerset Anti­Slavery Partnership (ASP), Bristol and other local authorities have, until now, turned a blind eye to their responsibility for the welfare of victims of trafficking. Hopefully this case will establish that they can no longer do so.

But in a turn for the worse, the government’s proposed immigration bill recommends a one year sentence and unlimited fine for illegal working. Trafficking experts fear that people will be treated as illegal workers rather than victims of trafficking, deterring them from reporting abuse.

The development of a trafficking support framework is urgently needed to better provide rehabilitation and support for individuals escaping exploitation. “If the UK government is serious about putting a stop to the trafficking of human beings, it needs to acknowledge the need for longer-­term measures to enable victims to recover; to support them to get their lives back on track and get out from under the long shadow of their traffickers,” observes Hunt. “It seems a small price to pay to strike a meaningful blow against this global trade in human suffering”.

Related content

Bristol City Council slapped with warning over poor performance on freedom of information requests

The local authority has been criticised for years over its failure to responding to FOI requests within 20-day timescales.

Trams, or an underground? As Bristol weighs its public transport options, can it learn from across the Channel?

Bristol is notorious for its congestion and poor public transport, and has been hit by a worsening bus crisis. As it looks to a new mass transit system to solve its problems, cities such as Rennes and Bordeaux can offer valuable lessons.

How local ‘health hubs’ could encourage more women to get checked for breast cancer

Bristol breast cancer rates are 16% higher than the national average, and women from deprived areas are less likely to attend appointments. We asked women about the impact better community-based services could make.

Bristol’s flood defences are being pushed to their limit. What is the city’s long-term plan, and will it be enough?

The council is searching for an extra £100 million to fund future flood defences to protect low-lying areas of the city. While residents call for greater action, the Cable looks across the North Sea to Rotterdam for inspiration.

Bristol won’t bring in parking levy to fund transport as council forced to publish report

Mayor Marvin Rees has again hit out at sceptics of plans for a Bristol underground, and said smaller schemes won't do enough to give us the public transport we need.

‘My anxiety levels are off the scale’: Tempers fray as student houses multiply on estate

As residents and students clash on High Kingsdown estate, Bristol City Council is being urged to enforce its own targets and lower the number of HMOs in the area. 

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning