Keep proper journalism alive. It's time to Back the Cable
The Bristol Cable

Judge finds against Avonmouth housing rights occupation


Council granted right to evict housing activist protesters from council home auctioned last month.

Photo: Lorna Stephenson

Protesters who occupied a property to protest the council’s controversial sell-off of properties at auction last month appeared in Bristol Civil and Family Justice Centre this morning, where the judge found in favour of the council’s right to evict them.

A possession order, giving the council the right to forcefully remove the protesters, can now be served immediately on the property.

A last minute defence was submitted on behalf of the defendants, Norman, Palmer and unknown persons, based on articles 8, 10 and 11 of the Human Rights Act 1998. The central premise is the distinction existing from prior cases’ judgements between ‘squatters’ and ‘protesters’, whose actions are aimed to advance political aims.

The defence asked for an adjournment – a postponement of two weeks for further preparation –  and another hearing, to debate points raised about the right to protest based on court cases of previous occupation-based protests at the University of Sussex and Occupy London.

Representation for the appellant, Bristol City Council, argued that property rights were paramount and the occupation was preventing the council from completing the sale of the home.

After retiring to consider, the judge delivered the ruling, declaring:

“I am not convinced there is a legitimate defence available to the defendants”.

The property, 44 Richmond Terrace, Avonmouth, is the last of the batch of 21 auctioned by the council last month. It was initially occupied by Anthony Palmer, a homeless ex-serviceman who was living in a homeless hostel with his son, on 20th April.

Palmer has been supported by other campaigners, who maintained a permanent presence at the property although none of them lived there full-time. Around 15 members of the public were present at the court and a banner was unfurled outside.

The council now have until the 1st of June to serve the possession order, and will likely employ bailiffs to evict the property at a date yet to be confirmed.

Join 2,500 Cable members redefining local media

Your support will help the Cable grow, deepening our connections in the city and investigating the issues that matter most in our communities.

Join now

What makes us different?


Report a comment. Comments are moderated according to our Comment Policy.

  • The Bristol Blogger

    News release: 44 RICHMOND TERRACE – “WE’RE NOT LEAVING!”

    Following a short hearing at Bristol’s County Court this morning, occupiers of 44 Richmond Terrace, Avonmouth have been ordered to leave the house immediately so that the sale of the council house can proceed to a private buyer.

    Occupiers of the house, who have been there since 20 April, six hours before the home was auctioned off to the highest bidder, have rejected the order out of hand. “We’re not leaving,” announced occupier Steve Norman immediately after the hearing.

    During the hearing the council revealed the buyer of their property had issued them with a Notice of Completion on 18 May after the council had failed to complete the sale transaction on time because they were unable to provide the buyer with ‘Unoccupied Possession” of the home.

    This Notice of Completion gives the council ten working days to complete the transaction or the sale falls through and the house remains in public ownership. The stage therefore is set for a battle between between bailiffs and occupiers leading up to this deadline of 2 June.

    Occupiers say, “we have contingency plans in place and are confident of remaining in the house for the foreseeable future.”

    Please call Steve 07747 490902


Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

Colston 4 judgment: ’The government is tearing up our protest rights’

The Colston Four were acquitted earlier this year after tearing down the Colston statue. But a Court of Appeal judgment means protesters will be less likely to receive similar protections in future.

5 key moments in history that led to the Police and Crime Act

Now the government has restricted peaceful protest, criminal defence solicitor Matt Foot explains the history of violent policing at protests and outlines how we got here.

‘It’s what God is asking of me’: Bristol reverend, 80, will risk arrest again to raise awareness of climate crisis

Supporters cheered as Reverend Sue Parfitt had a conviction overturned by a judge.

Andreas Malm: ‘Why climate activists should engage in acts of sabotage’

Environmental protesters need to rethink their tactics, argues a Swedish scholar of human ecology who came to Bristol this week.

Man charged with riot and arson says police escalated protest into violence

He is accused of trying to set police vehicles on fire during the Kill the Bill demo on 21 March, but blamed police for turning the protest violent.

Riot charges handed to Bristol Kill the Bill protesters are rare in recent history of unrest in Britain

Protesters face up to 10 years in prison after being charged with the most serious of public order offences. Lawyers comment on what this means and how recent riots and protests have been dealt with by the criminal justice system.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning