Covering what’s really going on in Bristol
Powered by 2,000 members
The Bristol Cable

To what extent do people’s sense of community, perception of influence and opportunity, or access to resources impact the way they voted in the EU referendum?

Words: Dean Ayotte
Charts: Dean Ayotte & Lucas Batt

As the Cable reported last week, the breakdown of Bristol’s EU referendum results by ward illuminated some striking disparities: despite the overall Bristol result favouring ‘remain’, many of the wards around the city’s outskirts voted to leave.

Here we look closely at how each ward voted and compare the results with social and economic factors.

To what extent do people’s sense of community, perception of influence and opportunity, or access to resources impact the way they voted in the referendum?

Influence & Opportunity

Interactive: hover to explore the data

There is a strong correlation between the extent to which people feel excluded from political power, and the way a ward voted. For example in Redland, one of the areas with the highest remain vote, the number of people who felt that they had influence over political decisions in Bristol was 32%, whereas in Hengrove & Whitchurch, an area with one of the highest leave votes, just 11% of people felt this way.

The difference in quality of education also seemed to relate to how the ward voted. In wards with a high number of people who got 5 A-C GCSEs the remain vote was higher. For example, in Redland 90.6% of pupils attained this standard, whereas in Avonmouth it was just 38.2%.

Money

Interactive: hover to explore the data

Any correlation between results and financial resources, or the lack of them, was less obvious. In some cases, financial difficulties seemed linked to the results. For example in Hartcliffe & Withywood, a ward where 22% said they struggled financially, 66.9% voted to leave. In Westbury-on-Trym, one of the most well off parts of Bristol, the leave vote was just 26.8%.

However other wards where many people struggle financially, such as Lawrence Hill and Easton, voted overwhelmingly to remain, showing money isn’t a clear factor one way or another.

Community

Interactive: hover to explore the data

Feelings of community and belonging seem to have influenced the way people chose to vote. Amongst leave voters there was generally a lower level of satisfaction with the communities they lived in, a concern that things had gotten worse, and less less hope for the future.

In Filwood 29% of people felt that their neighbourhood had gotten worse in the last two years, whereas in Clifton Down, only 7% of people felt this. On the other end of the scale amongst leave voters very few felt that life in their neighbourhood was improving. In Hengrove & Whitchurch Park just 6% of people felt life was getting better, whereas in Cotham this was 26%.

Integration

Interactive: hover to explore the data

In wards with high numbers of BME and/or non-British White residents, the remain vote tended to be stronger, even if the ward was deprived. For instance, Lawrence Hill is the most deprived ward in the city, and has a BME/Other White population of over 65%, and 71.7% voted to remain in the EU.

In areas which voted to leave the feeling that ‘people of different backgrounds get on well together’ was much lower than in areas which voted to remain. For example, in Bishopsworth just 46% of people felt that this statement was true, even though the area has an overwhelmingly White British population (93.9%).

The results in full:

Yellow: remain, Blue: leave.

Full data and sources on these infographics for all wards in the city.

Public interest journalism is expensive, takes time and can be risky.

But powering Bristol’s media co-op isn’t.

Join the Cable

Read more on: eu refrendum, inequality, infographic

Comments

Report a comment

  • John T says:

    I think it would be helpful to compare the raw numbers that make up the margins, i.e. the numbers of people represented by the yellow area above the 50% line and the blue area below the 50% line in the last infographic. In other words, how many remainers would have had to vote leave to take the leave vote above 50%. It’s worth remembering that a 50% vote for such a constitutional change is really nonsense, because you could end up with 49.99% of the population having major/fundamental changes imposed against their will (as presumably will now happen). Even the EU requires supermajorities in various cases (2/3 and 3/5 majorities). If the Scottish and now EU referenda had needed even a 2/3 majority, I doubt they would even have been called. Also, would the EU referendum have met e.g. Switzerland’s ‘double majority’ rule, whereby not only a majority of the population but also a majority of the cantons has to vote for a constitutional amendment to be adopted?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Bristol And Beyond Investigations Edition 8 Maps Podcast

Bristol in the Panama Papers

Edition 4 Investigations City

Dead space

Edition 5 Ideas And Action Visuals Infographics City

The history of struggle at Avonmouth Docks

Visuals Edition 5 Infographics

Get tooled up with the Bristol Cable!

Edition 4 Infographics Visuals

Taking The Piss: Agency Fees

Edition 3 Infographics Visuals

Inequality vs education

Powered by members

If you like our work, join us. For as little as £1 / month.

Join now