Help us reach our campaign target: Become a member
The Bristol Cable

Lawrence Hill power station: council denies further air quality studies

Bristol and Beyond

Despite levels of air pollution in the area breaching EU legal requirements, campaigners’ calls for more studies on the plant’s impact have been denied.

The council has rejected calls from community campaigners to postpone the planning decision being made on a controversial power station in Lawrence Hill. This would allow for a second independent air quality impact assessment to be conducted.

RADE (Residents Against Dirty Energy) Bristol only recently received a grant to enable them to commission an independent air quality assessment (AQA) on the application, the second that the company, Plutus Energy, has submitted for the inner-city site.

This new opportunity came late in the day: the planning officer’s recommendation for the council, to either approve or reject the plan, is due to be published on Wednesday (6th). The planning committee where the final decision is due to be made is taking place on 13th July.

RADE claim the AQA commissioned and submitted by Plutus as part of the application was based on inaccurate information, and used measures which failed to take the cumulative environmental impact into account.

Regarding the upcoming council decision, RADE campaigner Bruce Yates commented, “[Approving the application] goes against everything they should do, but they might not have a legal reason to refuse it. That’s why we want to give them a legal reason”.

In order to have time to do the assessment, they asked the council to postpone the planning committee. The council rejected the request, stating that the Plutus-commissioned AQA is adequate.

The company has applied to build a STOR (short term operating reserve) power plant running on biodiesel, part of a country-wide move to build more ‘stand-by’ facilities to supply extra power to the National Grid at times of high demand.

“The background level of NOx, which has health implications and can contribute to early death, in the local area is already contravening the EU permitted limits.”

The controversial plan is a second application from Plutus Energy, who submitted an application for a diesel ‘flexible generation’ facility back in September – a plan that was thrown out by the council due to air quality concerns.

The new application, despite its greener biodiesel credentials, has prompted hundreds of objections from locals. The proposed site is in close proximity to St Philips Marsh Nursery School.

The main criticisms levied at the Plutus air quality assessment by the plan’s opponents are that it rests on an assumed limit of 200 hours of operation per year, which campaigners say is a gross underestimate of the likely operational hours.

The assessment also uses the ‘peaking pollution levels’ rather than the background level when assessing the NOx (nitrogen oxide) pollution. The background level of NOx, which has health implications and can contribute to early death, in the local area is already contravening the EU permitted limits.

As stated by RADE campaigner Liz Beth in her letter to council, “the resulting pollution is potentially particularly devastating for a population of children that already record the highest number of hospital admissions for asthma in the city.”

Read more about Bristol’s air pollution problem, the history of STOR facility planning applications in Bristol, and the St Philips plan.

Comments

Report a comment. Comments are moderated according to our Comment Policy.

  • The next RADE public meeting is Thursday 07/07/16 – 6:30-8:30 pm at Barton Hill Settlement – we will have to fight this one hard so even if you can’t make the hearing on the 13th, we still need you at this meeting, the fight may not end on the 13th.

    Reply

  • Ruth Pickersgill

    So sorry I can’t make meeting on Thursday-let me know if there is something I can do to help.Ruth

    Reply

Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

The cost of clean air: how Bristol’s CAZ has left disabled people feeling forgotten

Disabled people can be badly affected by air pollution, and many support the aims of Bristol's Clean Air Zone (CAZ). But there are questions as to whether the council has done enough to consider the knock-on effects on their lives.

Bristol Clean Air Zone under fire as delays mean exemptions only lasting three months

The council has asked central government for an extension to the exemption period, amid residents' concerns about upcoming daily charges.

Concerns remain about Bristol’s Clean Air Zone, six months before launch

Criticisms of the Clean Air Zone include not enough support for businesses and legal pollution limits being too high.

Bristol was one of five areas with illegal air pollution in 2020

The city’s Clean Air Zone is finally coming into force next summer after multiple delays. Campaigners say it can’t come soon enough.

Cutting Bristol’s air pollution could help citizens’ mental as well as physical health

Evidence increasingly suggests that traffic pollutants can adversely affect the brain, impact cognitive function, and increase the risk of mental health problems. Bristol’s Clean Air Zone cannot come too soon.

Bristol Clean Air Zone approved for summer 2022, nearly a year later than planned

Support for greener transport and exemptions have finally been announced, four years after the government ordered Bristol to tackle illegal levels of air pollution

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning