Covering what’s really going on in Bristol
Powered by 2,000 members
The Bristol Cable

Despite levels of air pollution in the area breaching EU legal requirements, campaigners’ calls for more studies on the plant’s impact have been denied.

The council has rejected calls from community campaigners to postpone the planning decision being made on a controversial power station in Lawrence Hill. This would allow for a second independent air quality impact assessment to be conducted.

RADE (Residents Against Dirty Energy) Bristol only recently received a grant to enable them to commission an independent air quality assessment (AQA) on the application, the second that the company, Plutus Energy, has submitted for the inner-city site.

This new opportunity came late in the day: the planning officer’s recommendation for the council, to either approve or reject the plan, is due to be published on Wednesday (6th). The planning committee where the final decision is due to be made is taking place on 13th July.

RADE claim the AQA commissioned and submitted by Plutus as part of the application was based on inaccurate information, and used measures which failed to take the cumulative environmental impact into account.

Regarding the upcoming council decision, RADE campaigner Bruce Yates commented, “[Approving the application] goes against everything they should do, but they might not have a legal reason to refuse it. That’s why we want to give them a legal reason”.

In order to have time to do the assessment, they asked the council to postpone the planning committee. The council rejected the request, stating that the Plutus-commissioned AQA is adequate.

The company has applied to build a STOR (short term operating reserve) power plant running on biodiesel, part of a country-wide move to build more ‘stand-by’ facilities to supply extra power to the National Grid at times of high demand.

“The background level of NOx, which has health implications and can contribute to early death, in the local area is already contravening the EU permitted limits.”

The controversial plan is a second application from Plutus Energy, who submitted an application for a diesel ‘flexible generation’ facility back in September – a plan that was thrown out by the council due to air quality concerns.

The new application, despite its greener biodiesel credentials, has prompted hundreds of objections from locals. The proposed site is in close proximity to St Philips Marsh Nursery School.

The main criticisms levied at the Plutus air quality assessment by the plan’s opponents are that it rests on an assumed limit of 200 hours of operation per year, which campaigners say is a gross underestimate of the likely operational hours.

The assessment also uses the ‘peaking pollution levels’ rather than the background level when assessing the NOx (nitrogen oxide) pollution. The background level of NOx, which has health implications and can contribute to early death, in the local area is already contravening the EU permitted limits.

As stated by RADE campaigner Liz Beth in her letter to council, “the resulting pollution is potentially particularly devastating for a population of children that already record the highest number of hospital admissions for asthma in the city.”

Read more about Bristol’s air pollution problem, the history of STOR facility planning applications in Bristol, and the St Philips plan.

Public interest journalism is expensive, takes time and can be risky.

But powering Bristol’s media co-op isn’t.

Join the Cable

Read more on: air pollution, energy, power station, rade

Comments

Report a comment

  • Bruce Yates says:

    The next RADE public meeting is Thursday 07/07/16 – 6:30-8:30 pm at Barton Hill Settlement – we will have to fight this one hard so even if you can’t make the hearing on the 13th, we still need you at this meeting, the fight may not end on the 13th.

  • Ruth Pickersgill says:

    So sorry I can’t make meeting on Thursday-let me know if there is something I can do to help.Ruth

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Interviews Fight For Fair Air

‘If the water was killing hundreds of people every year, there would be an outcry’

Banner Home Page Edition 20 Fight For Fair Air

Farming’s devastating impact on urban air pollution

Reports Fight For Fair Air

Planning officers recommend APPROVAL of St Philip’s Marsh gas plant

Fight For Fair Air Co-op Community

Why Bristol needs to fight for fair air

Banner Home Page Fight For Fair Air Features Edition 19

Changing gear: what next for cycling in Bristol?

Fight For Fair Air Opinion Banner Home Page

Opinion: Bristol’s leadership is failing to stop the city choking

Powered by members

If you like our work, join us. For as little as £1 / month.

Join now