Help us to Keep The Lights On for another decade! Back the Cable
The Bristol Cable

Homeopathy: public money well spent?


Molly Asher asks why Bristol is one of the last places that homeopathy is still NHS funded, despite the practice being scientifically debunked.

Photo: Richard Craig (Flickr/CC BY 2.0)

The last several hundred centuries have seen the human population make massive advances in their understanding of human physiology, disease and how to treat the many ailments we suffer in the course of a lifetime. Years and years of research, rigorous scientific testing and clinical trials go in to the production of new treatment methods. And yet, in this modern world of evidence based treatment, the NHS continues to fund one artefact of a medical treatment manufactured in a by-gone age and with a complete and damning lack of evidence to support its efficacy.

The treatment in question, homeopathy, has somehow escaped unscathed from governmental evidence reviews recommending the NHS cease funding it. Instead, the situation at present leaves the funding decision in the hands of individual Clinical Commissioning Groups. The majority of these have chosen to cease providing the service. Crucially, Bristol CCG is one of the largest remaining funders nationwide. In the last financial year £151,000 was set aside to provide the service.

Although the government’s own Chief Medical Officer has expressed she is “perpetually surprised” that the NHS continues to fund homeopathy, it has received very little public attention. It seems likely that if more of the public were aware of exactly what homeopathy was, and that taxpayer’s money was being used to fund it, then there would be more of an outcry.

Widespread misunderstanding stems in part from confusion with herbal remedies from which, as many rightly point out, much of modern medicine is derived. However, whereas herbalism involves the direct administration of these herbs, preparation of homeopathic remedies involves dissolution of the active ingredient in water. The guiding principle? The more dilute the solution, the more potent the remedy becomes. Drops of the solution are then applied to sugar pills, creating a treatment closely resembling conventional medicine.

One group, the Good Thinking Society, have spearheaded a campaign to halt NHS funding of homeopathy. And they have not been without success: the turning of the tide away from homeopathy was underlined in June when Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) (one of the largest remaining spenders on homeopathy) announced they would decommission funding for such services.

Nonetheless, Bristol CCG is reluctant to let go. The city’s long history of homeopathy –from 1852 right up until last year it boasted a dedicated homeopathic hospital – offers some explanation for this.

Admittedly, Bristol has not managed to fly completely above the pressure to move away from homeopathy. Last year the homeopathic hospital closed and provision of the service was shifted to The Portland Centre for Integrative Medicine. This community interest company, located on the edge of Clifton Down, aims to deliver a ‘holistic approach’ to healthcare.

At the time of the Centre being opened, a response to a Freedom of Information request stated that the CCG had “no contract in place with the [Portland] Centre” for homeopathic services. However, notes from a CCG meeting held earlier this year details that the Portland Centre’s main source of income is NHS homeopathy referrals. 

How can this be? Although the NHS has no direct link to the Portland Centre, they continue to fund homeopathy due to having a contract with the University Hospitals Bristol (UHB), who in turn commission homeopathic services from the Portland Centre.

A spokesperson for the CCG confirmed that:

“Following the review into homeopathic treatment, it was recognised there were a number of options the CCG could take in terms of the future commissioning of the service. Before a formal decision can be made on the long-term future of the service, a public engagement exercise needs to take place. It was decided in the interim a prior approval policy would be implemented, meaning each individual case is reviewed against specific criteria.”

This decision flies in the face of the content of this review which clearly states that the only option consistent with the evidence base is to stop funding homeopathy. The CCG declined to provide further comment on why they were not willing to act in accordance with the evidence on offer. A date for the public engagement exercise has yet to be confirmed. 

Michael Marshall, of the Good Thinking Society campaign, is opposed to the continued service provision in Bristol and summarises for the Cable:

“Every penny spent on homeopathic remedies is money that could be far better spent providing effective treatments, funding worthwhile care initiatives and employing more nurses, doctors and counsellors. Every patient around the country whose operation is delayed or treatment is denied due to budgetary concerns can look with frustration to the money being wasted on homeopathy. Limited NHS resources should be spent on evidence-based medicine rather than on continued funding of homeopathy.”

Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that Martin Jones, Chair of Bristol CCG, is a qualified homeopathic physician. This article was accordingly corrected on the 23.9.16.

Join 2,500 Cable members redefining local media

Your support will help the Cable grow, deepening our connections in the city and investigating the issues that matter most in our communities.

Join now

What makes us different?


Report a comment. Comments are moderated according to our Comment Policy.

  • Evidence of homeopathy is undeniably positive and consistent. It’s a human evidence of experience, gathered from a real-world observation in a real-world setting giving real-world solutions. Upto the end of year 2010, there have been 300 studies published in 115 medical journals including 11 meta-analysis, 8 systematic reviews and 81 RCT in evidence of homeopathy to produce significant to substantial health benefits in a wide array of health conditions.


  • I came here to look for campaigning journalism, speaking truth to power, and instead found this. £151,000 out of a national budget of £20 billion! How about taking on the genuinely big-time money wasters in the NHS, like the constantly changing and failing IT systems made by party funders, or the government that’s starving it into privatisation? That might take a bit more effort than kicking homeopathy when it’s down, and might involve some complicated looking at all the experience and (poorly funded) research that actually does back up homeopathy.


    • Why compare the national budget for the entire NHS here? Do you not think £151,000 could be usefully spent on health care in Bristol, treatments that have an actual benefit for patients?

      Questioning whether our money should be used to support a multi-million pound industry selling sugar pills seems like a very reasonable thing for a journalist to do.


Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

VIDEO: What We Want – Bristol’s frontline workers reveal their priorities for the next government

We're only a few days away from a general election. In a short video series, frontline workers explain how their sector has fared under the Tories – and what changes they want to see.

Deal to reopen crucial St Paul’s dentists could be ‘sorted soon’, campaigners say

Hopeful messages emerge at community event hosted by campaigners, with dental care provider in detailed contract discussions with local health bosses that could see services return.

Revealed: Private takeover of Bristol GP surgery ‘abandoned’ at last minute

One Medicare was due to take over Charlotte Keel Medical Practice in Easton at the start of July – before NHS bosses abruptly pulled the plug.

A history of Bristol’s healthcare for the working classes

It's a myth that there was little or no access to free medical care before the establishment of the NHS in 1948 – but progress was slow, unequal and sometimes grisly.

Social care crisis leaves healthy patients stuck in Bristol’s hospitals

The lack of carers in the city is down to poor pay, Brexit, competition from the likes of Amazon and increasingly unaffordable housing.

Bristol midwife: ‘The system is broken and is breaking us with it’

Staff shortages, increased pressure and mental health issues are threatening to cause a mass exodus from midwifery. A Bristol midwife explains why she and her colleagues are taking to the streets this weekend to call for urgent action.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning