Help us reach our campaign target: Become a member
The Bristol Cable

This is how many Bristol rough sleepers will be ‘removed’ from UK

Documents obtained by the Cable show the council plans for removing immigrant rough sleepers


Documents reveal council plans for ‘Controlling Migration Fund’ project

Photo: Özge Çağla Aktaş

Documents obtained by the Cable show the council anticipates up to 128 non-British rough sleepers will be removed from the UK over the next two years by force if necessary.

The plans are part of the ‘rough sleepers project’ funded by the government’s ‘Controlling Migration Fund’ as previously revealed the Cable.

The council-led Streetwise team will continue at least two years worth cooperation with Immigration Enforcement, with an aim to detain and remove non-British rough sleepers from the UK, specifically those from Europe.

Immigrant rough sleepers targeted for removal

New information shows the council has identified 36 ‘immigrant rough sleepers’, 25 of which are from EU countries. Shockingly, one quarter of the EU rough sleepers are in employment but unable to access accommodation. While these people may be supported into better circumstances by the council team, others will face an order to leave the UK or be forcibly removed.

The remainder of non-British rough sleepers are from a range of countries, including those that may produce refugees such as Sudan and Eritrea.

The council stresses that the programme aims to help people leave the UK voluntarily. However, the documents state that where “individuals are persistently not exercising [EU] treaty rights and not willing to reconnect voluntarily Streetwise liaises with Immigration, Control and Enforcement (ICE) to facilitate administrative removal”. Streetwise are the council team responsible for delivering the project.

The council’s stated ‘key performance indicators’ show a predicted 64 rough sleepers will be removed each year for two years, both through ‘voluntary’ and ‘forcible’ means.

Charities and the mayor unaware of plans

Whereas the council list several charities as part of the plans to deal with complex cases, two leading organisations have said they were not informed and are not participating in the controversial programme.

Beth Wilson, director of Bristol Refugee Rights (BRR) said,

We are not and have not agreed to be part of an action plan as part of the Controlling Migration Fund rough sleepers project. BRR believes that everyone has a right to shelter and access to good advice. We will be seeking urgent clarification from Bristol City Council about how we were included in this plan without our knowledge or prior agreement.

Bristol Red Cross have also said they were not informed that they have been listed and are not part of the programme.

It appears as though BRR and Bristol Red Cross weren’t the only ones in the dark about the controversial funding. “The Mayor’s cabinet were only made aware of the application after the bids to the Controlling Migration Fund had been submitted,” a council spokesperson said.

‘City of Sanctuary’ status under threat?

The council partnership with Immigration Enforcement has raised concerns over Bristol’s City of Sanctuary status. City of Sanctuary is the national movement aimed at creating a hospitable and welcoming environment for migrants, especially those fleeing war and persecution.

Beth Wilson, director of Bristol Refugee Rights said: “We are very concerned to learn that Bristol City Council has been working with Immigration Enforcement, targeting rough sleepers.

“Targets for detention and removal are particularly troubling. We know that barriers in the asylum and immigration system and successive cuts to legal aid mean that those with protection needs are often left street homeless.

“Questions must now be answered about how in this ‘City of Sanctuary’ refused asylum seekers and other migrants are being targeted at such a vulnerable time.”

Speaking earlier this year following the initial revelations, vice chair of City of Sanctuary Caroline Beatty said forcible removal of anyone from the city “directly opposes the council’s stated commitment to uphold Bristol as a City of Sanctuary, so we have grave concerns about the scheme.”

She added, “We hope that the council will divorce itself from cooperation with the Immigration Enforcement Agency in the way that it implements the programme”.

However, the council denied that there was a contradiction between its partnership with Immigration Enforcement, and Bristol’s status as a City of Sanctuary.

A council spokesperson said, “We are confident that our approaches to both preventing homelessness and tackling crime and disorder are completely compatible with our City of Sanctuary status and the spirit of those commitments.”

What is the ‘rough sleepers project’?

The ‘rough sleepers project’ is funded through the council’s successful application for £180,000 to the government’s Controlling Migration Fund. The project is in close co-operation with Immigration Enforcement and specifically targets rough sleepers from the European Economic Area with an aim to “to target detention of [rough sleeping] individuals for enforced administrative removal”.

Bristol has also been awarded £300,430 for two projects focusing on migrant employment and integration and a further £321,750 to tackle rogue landlords, with the latter also in close partnership with immigration enforcement.

As previously reported, the government policy of deporting rough sleepers from the EEA and EU is subject to a legal challenge in the High Court. The hearing for this case will be held in late November with a ruling expected after Christmas.

The council have said they will not be stopping the programme pending the case, saying “There is no judicial review into the activities of Bristol City Council and our work to tackle street based Anti-Social Behaviour funded via the Controlling Migration Fund.”



Report a comment. Comments are moderated according to our Comment Policy.

  • This is disgusting and must be protested–is anyone doing this? The only ‘anti-social’ behavior is by the council, and I’m revolted that my council taxes would be used to apply for money from the central government to forcibly remove people that have every right to be right where they are. They are there because they can’t afford housing. That is the problem, and there is nothing criminal about not being able to afford a flat or being homeless. That they would avoid speaking with anyone from Bristol Refugee Rights and even the mayor says a lot.


Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

Analysis: It’s time for politicians to come together on mass transit

A leaked report has concluded that underground sections are needed and achievable in Bristol’s future mass transit system. As we move to the next stage in the process, we need our politicians to work together.

Row over shopping centre demolition decision grinds on after government walks away from intervening

Council planning lawyer argues decision to refuse proposed redevelopment of Broadwalk Centre in Knowle in May did not rule out this being reversed – as happened a few weeks later.

Bristol City Council slapped with warning over poor performance on freedom of information requests

The local authority has been criticised for years over its failure to responding to FOI requests within 20-day timescales.

Trams, or an underground? As Bristol weighs its public transport options, can it learn from across the Channel?

Bristol is notorious for its congestion and poor public transport, and has been hit by a worsening bus crisis. As it looks to a new mass transit system to solve its problems, cities such as Rennes and Bordeaux can offer valuable lessons.

How local ‘health hubs’ could encourage more women to get checked for breast cancer

Bristol breast cancer rates are 16% higher than the national average, and women from deprived areas are less likely to attend appointments. We asked women about the impact better community-based services could make.

Bristol’s flood defences are being pushed to their limit. What is the city’s long-term plan, and will it be enough?

The council is searching for an extra £100 million to fund future flood defences to protect low-lying areas of the city. While residents call for greater action, the Cable looks across the North Sea to Rotterdam for inspiration.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning