The Bristol Cable

After harsh criticism from government for dragging its feet, the council was ordered to provide its plan to tackle air pollution by 21 February. It now looks set to miss that deadline.

Photo: Colin Moody

The council has admitted it will not meet the deadline set by government to publish its Clean Air Plan citing “concerns arising from modelling”.

It now appears the city will not have its plan in place until autumn 2019, according to emails from the council.

The council was given until Thursday 21 February to submit its clean air action plan, following a legal threat and harsh rebuke by government for its delays in addressing Bristol’s dangerous levels of air pollution.




According to a report commissioned by Bristol City Council, over 300 deaths per year in Bristol are attributable to air pollution. Over 100,000 people are thought to live in mainly central areas where NO2 levels breach UK and EU legal standards.

The 21 February deadline was ordered by Dr Therese Coffey MP in a January letter to Mayor Marvin Rees. Coffey wrote to Rees that she was “absolutely astonished at your delay in improving air quality for the people of Bristol as quickly as possible”. The date is an extension of a previous December deadline.

“I should like to make clear that any delay or non-compliance with these deadlines will result in my being forced to consider legal action against Bristol City Council which may include issuing proceedings without further notice,” the MP wrote.

“Unpopular decisions need to be made to improve air quality. Is the political will there when votes could be at risk?”

The council is expected to eventually outline plans including a Clean Air Zone (a CAZ, involving some traffic charges) alongside various non-charging initiatives such as encouraging walking and cycling to cut down on pollution. Over half of the dangerous nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions in the city come from diesel HGVs and diesel cars.

When questioned on the delay in producing its clean air plan, a spokesperson for Bristol City Council said: “We are fully committed to tackling air quality in Bristol and working at pace to explore all possible options so we develop an  approach that works as quickly as possible for the city, does not have an impact on people with low incomes and has the best chance of long term sustainable success.”

You buy in

So we can't sell out

Become a member

Join the Cable

Bristol Cable members, participating in an ongoing survey on the media co-operative’s website, have raised concern at the lack of action from the Rees administration to tackle air pollution: “300 people a year are suffering early deaths in Bristol while Marvin twiddles his thumbs…,” one Cable member commented.“Unpopular decisions need to be made to improve air quality. Is the political will there when votes could be at risk?” asked another member.

The last stage of the council’s plans was the ‘Strategic Outline Case’ published in April 2018. It outlined the feasibility, choices and costs of different approaches for reducing Bristol’s NO2 pollution.

Four of five options presented in the strategic outline case included a CAZ. This involves introducing a zone, or zones, in the city’s most polluted localities where certain highly polluting diesel vehicles are charged to enter. The next step is for the council to determine – and action – their preferred option of those proposed in the strategic outline case.

Bath and North East Somerset was also one of the 27 local authorities asked to bring down levels of NO2. Following public consultation, the authority has now submitted its plans to introduce a ‘Class D’ CAZ in the city centre which would see higher emission cars charged £9 per day to enter the zone, and higher emission buses, coaches and HGVs charged £100.

BANES council says it will introduce measures to support businesses and vulnerable groups who may be adversely affected by the CAZ.

In January, Leeds City Council was given the green light to introduce its CAZ from January 2020. In the Leeds plan, private cars will not be charged. Other polluting vehicles face a charge of £50 per day to enter the zone.

The options

There are five options presented in the Strategic Outline Case. One a ‘package’ of non-charging options – e.g., there will be no charges on traffic.

Four possible options included a Clean Air Zone (CAZ) which would be charged. They suggest different options for the geographic area the CAZ and the types of vehicles that would be covered. The most polluting vehicles only are subject to be charged to enter the zone. This includes diesel vehicles which don’t meet ‘Euro 6’ emissions standards, and petrol vehicles which don’t meet ‘Euro 4’, are included.

There are four classes of Clean Air Zone:

Class A – Buses, coaches, taxis and private hire vehicles

Class B – Buses, coaches, taxis, PHVs and heavy goods vehicles (HGVs)

Class C – Buses, coaches, taxis, PHVs, HGVs and light goods vehicles (LGVs)

Class D – Buses, coaches, taxis, PHVs, HGVs LGVs and cars

Bristol council’s options are to have a Class C CAZ in either a ‘medium’ or ‘small’ area, or to have a Class D CAZ in either a ‘medium’ or ‘small’ area.

Join 2,600+ Cable members working together to redefine local media.

Your support will help the Cable grow, deepening our connections in the city and investigating the issues that matter most in our communities.

Join now

What makes us different?

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

Greens and Labour are close in Windmill Hill, where climate, air pollution and housing are key concerns for locals

It’s likely to be a tight fight in Windmill Hill again, after Labour beat the Greens by just a few hundred votes last election.

Will Bristol’s new clean air zone influence city centre voters at the polls?

Central ward was a close race between Labour and the Greens in 2016, with a low turnout and just seven votes in it.

‘If everything worked you could get rid of cars’: Travel is the election issue in Bishopston and Ashley Down

Bishopston and Ashley Down is currently split between the Green Party and Labour. The Greens want a Residents’ Parking Zone, while Labour are pushing for low-traffic neighbourhoods. These stances on cars, pollution and transport may swing the vote.

In Southville, a U-turn on parking problems is shaking up the local election race

Residents in streets not covered by a residents’ parking zone have been campaigning without success to get it extended. Days before the election, Labour candidates are promising action from the council.

'The new Bristol and WECA mayors will need to move fast to clean up Bristol's air'

The need for steps to be taken on our dangerously polluted air is clear, but change is slow to come, writes clean air campaigner Katrina Billings.

The campaigners creating an environmental movement with social justice at its core

Air pollution disproportionately affects ethnic minorities and deprived communities, yet environmental movements tend to be predominantly white and middle class. We sit down with Olivia Sweeney, Black and Green ambassador, to ask what is being done about this in the city, and what are her hopes f...

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday