Help us reach our campaign target: Become a member
The Bristol Cable

Opinion: Bristol’s leadership is failing to stop the city choking

Fight For Fair Air

Marvin Rees’ announcement this week that there is a ‘timeline’ for producing a Clean Air Plan is too little, too late.

Photo: Colin Moody

Let’s face facts: Bristol’s current leaders have now spent years failing to deal with the air pollution emergency the city is facing. Toxic air impacts all of us, and yet our politicians get away with offering us nothing but empty words and endless excuses. Once again, Mayor of Bristol Marvin Rees has effectively just kicked the can down the road on the issue, with no meaningful action being taken on air pollution until at least 2020. By then, hundreds more people in Bristol will have lost their lives to a problem we already know the solution to.

The more we find out about the dangers air pollution poses to our health, the more worried we should be. Experts say air pollution caused by motor vehicles is behind almost one in ten deaths, killing hundreds of people every year in Bristol alone. Our children’s lungs are not developing fully as a result of dirty air they are breathing. Researchers have now linked the toxic air to heart disease, asthma, strokes, lung cancer and even dementia.

The causes of dangerous air pollution are well known: first and foremost vehicle emissions, especially diesel vehicles. Researchers from ClairCity found that 40% of nitrogen dioxide emissions (the toxic airborne compound linked to respiratory illnesses) comes from diesel cars in the city centre, with larger vehicles like vans, coaches and lorries causing much of the remaining 60% of the emissions.

With all this becoming a serious concern to families in Bristol and across the country, you would think our politicians would be working hard to introduce solutions to keep us safe. That’s how society (eventually) responded when the dangers of smoking and drinking became better understood. What has been shocking to me is seeing politicians actively work against necessary solutions because they believe it will increase their vote share.

Our political leaders are clearly afraid to take any action which risks upsetting drivers

Our political leaders, and well as decision-makers employed by the council and transport authorities, are clearly afraid to take any action which risks upsetting drivers. As Marvin Rees declared in his Mayoral Address last October, “We will not repeat the errors of recent years in pretending that cars will disappear if we make life difficult for car drivers.” They expect us to just accept living with dangerous and illegal levels of air pollution. It has to stop.

Bristol will be stuck with dangerous air pollution until the number of vehicle journeys in our city starts going down. This is a fact, although one which might be hard to swallow. Anyone who claims otherwise is not telling the truth, or has an exaggerated belief in unproven technological fixes. Cars are used for almost half of journeys under 2 km in Bristol, which is walking distance for most of us. Since 2001, the number of cars and vans owned in the city has almost doubled to 309,762. But authorities in Bristol haven’t even come up with a goal for reducing the number of car journeys for the short or medium term, or even that they need to set any such goal.

Other cities around the country have taken steps to protect people from toxic air. Edinburgh, Birmingham and London are introducing car-free zones where the problem is worst and victims the most vulnerable: outside schools. Automatic number-plate recognition is used to issue fines to drivers. Financial penalties are one of the few effective ways to get people to change behaviour. Plans to restrict the most polluting vehicles have long been discussed for the most polluted parts of Bristol, but these have been pushed back and watered down by the current council leadership again and again, to the point where Bristol is facing legal action from the government for failing to act on the public health emergency that air pollution represents.

Now is the time for change

Transport is a social justice issue. It’s people in some of the poorest Bristol wards who pay the price for bad transport policies, and unfairly, who also have to live with the highest levels of congestion and toxic air. But this latest announcement from Marvin Rees appears to make it clear that private cars, even the most polluting kind, won’t be included in any new restrictions aimed at improving air quality., The Mayor, backed by his notably car-friendly advisor Kevin Slocombe, claims that measures to reduce vehicle journeys would impact negatively on the poorest in the city.

Children are suffering and people are dying, for no good reason

Well, low-income households in Bristol actually suffer a huge economic disadvantage when they are forced into car ownership. Estimates show that running a car costs on average more than £200,000 over a lifetime. That’s more than enough to pay off most people’s mortgages. Far too many households find themselves running one, two or even three cars because public transport, walking or cycling aren’t real options for the most part, as they would be in for example London.

Sometimes there is no getting around the fact that the solution to a problem is political. Air pollution is that kind of problem. I am appalled that the current Bristol administration have put electoral calculations over public health concerns, by resisting measures to get polluting vehicles off our streets. They are only now presenting what is in effect a ‘plan for a plan’, and are once again asking the people of Bristol to trust them that there won’t be further delays after that. After three years in charge, Marvin Rees has shown he’s not prepared to step up and show real leadership on this critical issue. Every single member of Bristol Labour should reflect very seriously on the situation before they throw their weight behind a potential re-election campaign for Marvin Rees.

In next year’s elections, I will give my support to whichever party or candidate is proposing the most ambitious short-term measures to solve the air pollution emergency. I hope political parties from across the spectrum will come together to deal with the problem properly instead of competing over who can dodge it long enough, or taking shots at any elected representative brave enough to introduce solutions which might be unpopular with drivers.

Children are suffering and people are dying, for no good reason. The time for talk is over, now we need action.

Seth Piper is a transport and sustainability campaigner.


Report a comment. Comments are moderated according to our Comment Policy.

  • Fuck yes! Thanks for this. The mayor has repeatedly said he’s not anti-car, which is completely backwards in this day and age. There will be multiple young and old people’s deaths on your hands, Marvin, unless you act soon.


  • “Marvin Rees declared in his Mayoral Address last October, “We will not repeat the errors of recent years in pretending that cars will disappear if we make life difficult for car drivers.” They expect us to just accept living with dangerous and illegal levels of air pollution. It has to stop.”

    That sums it up perfectly.


Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

Bristol’s flood defences are being pushed to their limit. What is the city’s long-term plan, and will it be enough?

The council is searching for an extra £100 million to fund future flood defences to protect low-lying areas of the city. While residents call for greater action, the Cable looks across the North Sea to Rotterdam for inspiration.

Urban growers are quietly laying the ground for a food revolution. Can it become a reality?

Growing fruit and veg close to home is better for our health – and could help keep us fed when climate change disrupts supply chains. Could doing more of it provide a secure, affordable, and sustainable way of meeting Bristol's needs?

Campaigners ‘marry’ River Avon as battle against water sewage pollution continues

Since the mayor’s decision in November not to grant special status to a popular swimming spot, sewage has been discharged into the Avon for the equivalent of 35 days.

This week in Bristol: Demonstrators say council is “refusing to correct” conservation mistake

After accidentally giving a landowner permission to cut down an ancient Bristol hedgerow with protected status as a biodiversity haven, the council say there’s nothing they can do.

Why Bristol needs to build a sustainable food system – before disaster strikes

Bristol is recognised as a leading city in sustainable food. But with international food systems creaking and the impact of climate change on the horizon, even more needs to be done.

Revealed: Data tool shows extent of sewage spills at popular Bristol swimming spot – and it’s grim

As campaigners work tirelessly to document sewage spills by Wessex Water into the Avon, top bosses at the water company have earned big bonuses for meeting environmental targets.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning