The Bristol Cable
Last autumn, a key election pledge by the mayor on affordable homes bit the dust, making headlines. But what else do the numbers say about Rees’s record, and the council’s ongoing housing crisis headaches?

Last September, four months after a planned election could have already reinstated him if a pesky virus hadn’t put it on hold, a famous 2016 campaign-trail pledge by Bristol’s mayor Marvin Rees came to bite him on the arse.

A council committee report confirmed that in 2020-21, our local authority area would be getting nowhere near the 800 new affordable homes Rees promised to deliver annually by then. New figures reveal, in fact, that of the 1,350 to 1,994 homes that were completed each year in Bristol in the four years from 2016/17 to 2019/20, only between 188 and 312 each year were affordable.

Blaming the pandemic’s impact on construction, the document set a new “stretch target” of 500 affordable homes during 2020-21, which is likely to be “almost met” thanks to a forecasted 489 completions. In a deft bit of expectation management, it adds that house building targets are often influenced by a 20% “optimism bias” – meaning 389 affordable homes – below half of Rees’s target – is more realistic.

Still, the report goes on, a minimum of 797 more affordable homes should be added in 2021-22, and at least 1,028 in 2022-23. The council’s recently departed housing chief, Paul Smith, told the Cable’s Bristol Unpacked podcast in September the missed target should be seen as delay, not failure, given the state of 2020 and other non-Covid factors beyond the authority’s control.

Housing dominated Bristol’s last mayoral campaign – those pledges were important because the city’s affordability crisis took hold during George Ferguson’s tenure, with asking prices and rent levels spiralling. In April 2016, a Cable investigation revealed the council had flogged off hundreds of knackered but irreplaceable period homes, a practice that controversially continued under Ferguson, sparking anger just before the election.

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning

Smith stopped that, with about 100 properties refurbished and put back into use as regular council homes or homeless accommodation, or handed over to specialist charities. This was possibly made easier because a plan developed by David Cameron’s government, which would have forced councils to sell their most valuable houses, was scrapped after Theresa May took over as prime minister.

Central government policy shackles councils’ ability to tackle local housing crises, and just before Christmas the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee described the national landscape of the last few years as a “deplorable… cycle of policy invention, abandonment and reinvention”.

Given that tough context, and with housing set to be just as hot an issue when the election rolls back round – mutant-coronavirus permitting – here we attempt a measured look at Rees-era progress and the challenges the next mayor, whoever they are, will face.

Comments

    Report a comment
    Comments are moderated according to our Comment Policy

  • Smallfry says:

    The council should sell off some of its more expensive housing. A friend of mine is living around the downs and his council house is worth over £500k. This could be sold a two houses bought else where

  • Shane says:

    Marvin Rees should be out of office as he’s had his time and has done nothing for Southmead and taken away open space in clen coo square and shutting off the shopping area and putting in flower beds which is a waste of money and time and this will be destroyed by the young ones who don’t give a dum.why don’t they build down at henbury as there is plenty of space behind the flats and Aldi plus he bury hill instead of wasting the statures in place here why not repair the roads around here which is in disrepair and the concrete badly breaking up

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

‘Saving every tree is not the answer’

In recent years it seems there hasn’t been a single tree-felling in the city that hasn’t been met with some kind of outcry, regardless of how clearly the benefits outweigh the cost. We must confront this shortsightedness.

High-rises under scrutiny as council considers rebuilding social housing

Homes at Kingsdown and Lawrence Weston are the first focus of estate regeneration plans, but new housing boss pledges to put tenants at heart of decisions over whether any blocks come down.

'Why Bristol needs openness and transparency on house building'

Bristol desperately needs more affordable housing, but this is difficult to deliver in a planning system that stinks, writes former Green councillor Clive Stevens.

Number of homeless single people more than triples during pandemic

While rough sleeping has plummeted in the past 12 months, there has been a sharp increase in the number of people living in temporary accommodation.

Greens and Labour are close in Windmill Hill, where climate, air pollution and housing are key concerns for locals

It’s likely to be a tight fight in Windmill Hill again, after Labour beat the Greens by just a few hundred votes last election.

Green spaces a priority for voters in Horfield, where every vote could be crucial

Green spaces, litter and a community space are key issues in Horfield, where the Tories and Labour were neck and neck in the last council election.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday