Help us reach our campaign target: Become a member
The Bristol Cable

‘Fossil fuelled public sector pensions reveal deep political faultlines on climate crisis action’

Over 100,000 local public-sector pensions are invested in firms that threaten our future. The reasons why are complex – but the situation is not compatible with Bristol’s zero-carbon pledges, says Adam Cantwell-Corn

Edition 24

Illustration: Marta Zubieta

We’re hurtling towards a climate catastrophe based on burning fossil fuels.

So why hasn’t Avon Pension Fund, the organisation that administers a multi-billion pound pot on behalf of 100,000 local workers and more than 400 regional public sector employers, including Bristol City Council, stopped investing in oil, coal and gas companies?

The answer is far from straightforward, and reveals political faultlines between people who agree on the threat climate change poses, but not on how to address it – in Bristol and beyond with £10 Billion invested in fossil fuels by local government pension schemes across the UK.

In September 2020, Marvin Rees, in a joint declaration with mayors from 12 international cities, committed Bristol to taking “all possible steps to divest city assets from fossil fuel companies” and “[called] on city pension funds to do the same”. Though lacking a specific timeframe to act, the announcement was lauded in the media. But it came as a surprise locally.

Some Labour councillors have resisted efforts to pressure the Avon Pension Fund, and other major contributing employers, towards deadlines for dropping investments in oil, gas and coal. Officially the administration supports divestment, but not committing to a timeline severely dilutes its stance. 

These are hardly climate-change deniers, but self-styled pragmatists. In amending Green Party motions in 2015 and 2019 aimed at ending fossil-fuel investments within five years, they argued that the pension fund should focus on working with companies to change, “rather than ‘walking away’ and surrendering all influence”. 

The theory is that shareholders can persuade companies to direct more of their enormous resources towards clean energy. Investors have a seat at the table – and getting rid of the investments could see them picked up by even less scrupulous parties. As such, divestment is merely symbolic and risks “playing politics” with people’s pensions in a way that is “anti-worker”, according to the Labour amendment of the Green motion in 2019. 

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning

Aside from the fact that any individual pension of this type is guaranteed, and that workers from local branches of the trade union Unison have formally called for the fund to rapidly divest from fossil fuels, the theory does have credibility. It’s the approach taken by Avon Pension Fund and its parent organisation, the Brunel Pension Partnership, which oversees a huge fund of £30bn for workers across the whole region. These funds are considered some of the best at increasing low-carbon investments and lobbying dirty companies to clean up their act.

Still, they reject divestment as ineffective and too financially risky, at least until a review of the Paris climate agreement in 2023. This approach is supported by Labour councillor Steve Pearce, the council’s voting representative on Avon Pension Fund board. (Until at least 2017, Pearce is recorded as having investments in Rio Tinto, one of the world’s biggest mining companies, which was until 2018 heavily invested in coal. As the Avon Pension Fund maintains shares in Rio Tinto, the Cable asked Pearce to comment on personal investments but the requests went unanswered).

Though some changes are welcome, the big question is, do the letters, and shareholder motions, really shift such companies away from their profitable business models? Is it credible that Avon Pension Fund’s investment in Rosneft, the Russian state-backed oil giant set on new mass exploitation of the melting Arctic, will prompt the firm to act on ethical concerns? Will its £2.2m in Glencore, one of the world’s biggest coal miners, have any effect? 

Companies can make superficially positive statements that mask deeper inaction. In April 2020, Shell announced ‘ambitions’ to be carbon-neutral by 2050, while resisting shareholder efforts to bind them to specific targets. Five months later, Shell began new Arctic oil exploration. At that time, Avon Pension Fund had £3.2m invested in the company.

Choices, choices

Trouble is, there’s also not much hard evidence supporting the impact of divestment – though dozens of major international and UK institutions, such as universities and the Church of England, have moved on from fossil fuels, the assets are just resold. Similarly, Glencore’s CEO said last year that to divest from a coal mine would most likely see a Chinese company buy it, operating with lower environmental standards. 

Nonetheless, money that remains tied up in stubborn companies equals less investment in the green solutions and jobs we desperately need. There are no perfect answers – but the clock is ticking and political choices need to be made. For Bristol to lead the way, and meet the letter and spirit of its various declarations to be carbon-neutral by 2030, surely we can’t be financing fossil fuels?

Are you a member of the Avon Pension Fund? You can find out more about the investments in your name at


Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

Bristol’s flood defences are being pushed to their limit. What is the city’s long-term plan, and will it be enough?

The council is searching for an extra £100 million to fund future flood defences to protect low-lying areas of the city. While residents call for greater action, the Cable looks across the North Sea to Rotterdam for inspiration.

Urban growers are quietly laying the ground for a food revolution. Can it become a reality?

Growing fruit and veg close to home is better for our health – and could help keep us fed when climate change disrupts supply chains. Could doing more of it provide a secure, affordable, and sustainable way of meeting Bristol's needs?

Campaigners ‘marry’ River Avon as battle against water sewage pollution continues

Since the mayor’s decision in November not to grant special status to a popular swimming spot, sewage has been discharged into the Avon for the equivalent of 35 days.

This week in Bristol: Demonstrators say council is “refusing to correct” conservation mistake

After accidentally giving a landowner permission to cut down an ancient Bristol hedgerow with protected status as a biodiversity haven, the council say there’s nothing they can do.

Why Bristol needs to build a sustainable food system – before disaster strikes

Bristol is recognised as a leading city in sustainable food. But with international food systems creaking and the impact of climate change on the horizon, even more needs to be done.

Revealed: Data tool shows extent of sewage spills at popular Bristol swimming spot – and it’s grim

As campaigners work tirelessly to document sewage spills by Wessex Water into the Avon, top bosses at the water company have earned big bonuses for meeting environmental targets.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning