Help us to Keep The Lights On for another decade! Back the Cable
The Bristol Cable

‘If everything worked you could get rid of cars’: Travel is the election issue in Bishopston and Ashley Down

Bishopston and Ashley Down is currently split between the Green Party and Labour. The Greens want a Residents’ Parking Zone, while Labour are pushing for low-traffic neighbourhoods. These stances on cars, pollution and transport may swing the vote.

Local Elections 2021

Gloucester Road carves through Bishopston and Ashley Down ward. Double-deckers chug along; stuck behind them, cars stop-start while cyclists squeeze through the gaps. On both sides, dense Victorian housing with no off-street parking leaves cars lining the narrow streets.

In Bristol City Council’s 2019-2020 quality of life survey, 88% of Bishopston and Ashley Down residents thought air quality was an issue. A reliance on private cars due to a lack of safe and affordable travel options compounds the problem. Currently the ward has one Green councillor, Eleanor Combley, and one Labour councillor, Tom Brook; both are standing down. As both parties vye for seats, candidates’ views about cars will be key.

Active travel and air quality

Perhaps surprisingly, Gloucester Road is one of the city’s busiest cycle routes: according to Bristol Cycling, the numbers of cyclists doubled between 2007 and 2017. Cyclists share the potholed bus lane or are funnelled into a bike lane that doubles as a car park, delineated by a strip of paint. Police recorded 119 crashes where a cyclist was hurt on Gloucester Road between 2015 and 2017 – the highest of Bristol’s cycle routes.

Bishopston resident Sophie Kidd, who has lived in the area for 17 years, says the road is too dangerous to let her children cycle into town. Pollution also stops her from using active travel more: she is a runner, and notices the “suffocating feeling” from poor air quality.

“We avoid Gloucester Road as much as we can. It’s the stopping and starting, where you’re constantly getting fumes.” Sophie worries that long-term exposure will affect her children. Bristol’s Clean Air Zone will not stretch as far north as Bishopston.

Though Gloucester Road has a frequent bus service, it isn’t viable for Sophie: “I’m as guilty as the next person – when you compare the cost of the five of us taking the bus versus parking in the centre of town, we opt for the car. If everything was working efficiently you could get rid of cars.”

Ross Harrison lives on Ashley Down Road, a major through route to the M32. Traffic queues at peak times, but in spring 2020 it was deserted. “I really noticed how much nicer the air was in lockdown,” Ross says. “Now that almost normal traffic levels have returned, I hope we don’t forget the benefits home working had to our environment. Poor air quality and needless car journeys are damaging people’s health.”

He calls it “frustrating” that alternative travel options are more difficult than driving – making people feel they need a car. “Gloucester Road and so many long and narrow streets in Bishopston and Ashley Down could be put to such better use, if only we didn’t need to find as much room for cars.”

Ashley Down Road is also where a 100-year-old holm oak is threatened by felling. Bristol City Council say the foundations of a nearby house are being undermined by its roots; local campaigners say the impact that cutting it down will have on air quality is worse.

Parking problems

The area has very little off-street parking. Illegal parking across junctions and on double yellow lines are regularly reported by Bishopston and St Andrews Traffic and Parking Group (BOSA), which was started by concerned residents. Recently, the group has run a high-profile campaign against pavement parking, which prevents pedestrians from being able to safely use the pavements – especially people using wheelchairs or pushing prams.

A 2018 report by BOSA fed into a council survey about a Residents’ Parking Scheme (RPS). More than 1,600 people responded to the council: 60% were in favour of an RPS for parts of Bishopston. There is no indication if or when this may be implemented.

Pavement parking is an accessibility issue across the ward. Photo: Jess Connett

Sophie – who can spend 45 minutes trying to find a parking space in the evenings – says an RPS won’t solve things on its own. “It’ll be a cost per year and I still won’t be able to park outside my house. Unless you get people on a bus or on a bike, an RPS isn’t going to help.” Shoppers and parents doing the school run would still be able to park for a short time. Even current traffic warden patrols are little deterrent: in an affluent neighbourhood, an occasional fine is a risk worth taking.

Business owners also warn that an RPS would ruin their livelihoods. Bishopston resident Sarah Gillman says it’s a difficult balance: “I would never want people not to be able to park in our street and lose the Gloucester Road shops’ trade but it’s hard – particularly as I’m asthmatic. Our lovely community will slowly die if this isn’t sorted out soon.”

Who are the candidates?

Before the ward boundaries changed in 2016, Bishopston had been held by the Greens since 2013.

The Green Party candidates are Emma Edwards and Lily Fitzgibbon. Both told the Cable they wanted to protect mature trees in the area, including the Ashley Down oak, and plant more urban trees. They are in favour of an RPS.

Lily Fitzgibbon and Emma Edwards, Green Party

Edwards has lived in the area for 13 years. She says: “We need to tackle the traffic that causes this area to have poor air quality. City centre Clean Air Zones need to be scrutinised to make sure that traffic is not being simply pushed into residential areas.” She calls for public transport to be cheaper and for investment in active travel routes, giving people “better options for getting around Bristol other than driving”.

Fitzgibbon, who is co-chair of the Young Greens, says: “I would push to improve alternatives to driving, particularly supporting the reopening of Ashley Down train station, and improvement to cycle infrastructure. I would like other methods of transportation to become an easier and more attractive offer.”

Running for Labour are Joe Rayment and Eileen Means. Rayment became the youngest councillor in Bath and North East Somerset Council when elected to Twerton ward in 2015, while Means was councillor for Brislington West from 2015 to 2016.

Rayment says his focuses are planting trees and investing in active travel and public transport, including Ashley Down station. Until it opens, he is calling for “eliminating rat-running with ‘liveable neighbourhoods’, where some roads are strategically blocked at one end with planters or trees.” Over 80% of residents support the idea, he says. Overton Road in Bishopston is being considered by the council as somewhere where cars could be restricted, but it is outside the ward boundaries.

Eileen Means and Joe Rayment, Labour

Means says Labour have identified areas for tree planting, including Dirac Road play area. She supports planting ‘tiny forests’: “These not only help reduce pollution, but can include fruit trees to provide free, local fruit for communities. We’d also push for more trees lining roads in the ward, where pollution is worst.”

Standing for the Liberal Democrats are Phil Kemp and Becky Lockyer. Kemp could not be reached for comment. Lockyer came fifth when she stood in the ward in 2016. She says: “The only way to tackle pollution in Bishopston and Ashley Down is to get people out of their cars, which means working with local residents to provide them with safe streets and reliable public transport.” She also wants to keep pavements clear from cars, bins and “inconsiderately abandoned” e-scooters.

Becky Lockyer, Lib Dems

“By enabling people to safely walk or cycle, or use public transport, car usage will drop and the reduction in noise, pollution and danger will encourage others out of their cars, creating a positive momentum for change,” she adds.

The Conservative candidates are Tony Holdsworth and Adam Brown. They did not respond to our requests for comment.

Ashley Down resident Ross says whoever is elected shouldn’t be afraid to propose radical changes: “It’s so obvious that the council needs to do more to help people and encourage sustainable transport use. I think more people realise the need for strong action than councillors think.”

Join 2,500 Cable members redefining local media

Your support will help the Cable grow, deepening our connections in the city and investigating the issues that matter most in our communities.

Join now

What makes us different?


Report a comment. Comments are moderated according to our Comment Policy.

  • Everything does work with cars. The problem with air pollution is people are not in their cars. If you’re walking or cycling you’re exposed to the pollution. You need to be in your car, that’s the safest place for everyone.


  • Not easy is it. I am a Bishopston resident, with lung issues, who uses a car to get about, with a boot load of tools to help vulnerable skint friends, and I use it to give them lifts too. Routes, timescales, & “luggage” thus render other transport unfeasable. Electric cars are way beyond my budget.


Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

Bristol’s Clean Air Zone is not exactly winning people over – but the data says it’s working

A new report shows air pollution has reduced both inside and outside the zone a year after it came into force. But many feel poorer people are being punished while traffic is just being rerouted around the city.

The cost of clean air: how Bristol’s CAZ has left disabled people feeling forgotten

Disabled people can be badly affected by air pollution, and many support the aims of Bristol's Clean Air Zone (CAZ). But there are questions as to whether the council has done enough to consider the knock-on effects on their lives.

Bristol Clean Air Zone under fire as delays mean exemptions only lasting three months

The council has asked central government for an extension to the exemption period, amid residents' concerns about upcoming daily charges.

Concerns remain about Bristol’s Clean Air Zone, six months before launch

Criticisms of the Clean Air Zone include not enough support for businesses and legal pollution limits being too high.

Bristol was one of five areas with illegal air pollution in 2020

The city’s Clean Air Zone is finally coming into force next summer after multiple delays. Campaigners say it can’t come soon enough.

Cutting Bristol’s air pollution could help citizens’ mental as well as physical health

Evidence increasingly suggests that traffic pollutants can adversely affect the brain, impact cognitive function, and increase the risk of mental health problems. Bristol’s Clean Air Zone cannot come too soon.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning