Help us reach our campaign target: Become a member
The Bristol Cable

‘We need public leaders and institutions to be bold with big ideas, despite the risks and bad PR’

When we face existential issues like the climate crisis, or calls for radical changes to problems that affect us all, we need public institutions and leaders to not be timid.

Illustration: Till Lukat


High-profile failures by public institutions provoke strong reactions and provide ammunition with which Twitter and journalists, this publication included, can take those entrusted with public funds and elected office to task. And rightly so.

Take Bristol Energy, an initiative that wasted £43million of public cash. The venture was riddled with poor planning and management and, when it came crashing down, a lack of transparency. There must be accountability for such failures. 

But in dragging politicians and institutions over the coals, we shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. In doing so we risk incentivising public servants and leaders to be risk-averse, setting low bars that can be cleared easily and without the furore of failed ambitions. This plays into the hands of the idea that the public sector is inherently incompetent and ineffectual, and needs to get out of the way and let business crack on with solving problems.

When we face existential issues like the climate crisis, or call for radical changes to problems that affect us all – poor transport systems, for example – we need public institutions and leaders to take up that mantle. As history shows, from the formation of the welfare state to the development of breakthrough technologies like the internet or in pharmaceuticals, we can’t rely on anything else to drive that long-term, risky and socially beneficial work. 

This isn’t an argument for the mantra of just ‘getting things done’. But it is to say that that with big issues tinkering around the edges is not good enough. Take the proposed underground rail network that Mayor Marvin Rees is intently pushing for. Evidence suggests it’s probably not the right solution. But we do need a transformative approach to public transport as the city grows ever bigger and congested, which will involve financial and political risk. The private sector won’t deliver this on its own. So an openness to bold ideas should be seen positively, even if the proposed solution isn’t right.

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning

Still, while encouraging big thinking, we need to ensure the best ideas get chosen and are well managed, to avoid fiascos like Bristol Energy.

That’s where the political process needs to help. There is a lot of fractiousness in the council chamber at the moment and so there should be on real political differences. But a common complaint from the mayor’s administration is that opposition parties are chasing headlines and being obstructive, rather than proposing solutions. If Rees and co want to minimise this and be enabled to better lead on ‘getting things done’ they have to open up genuine opportunities for collaboration on common ground where it exists, particularly with the Greens.

This starts with resisting the instinct to close ranks and restrict transparency to selected groups and individuals, as has been criticised with the ‘One City’ approach. Scrutiny and even political tension can result in better decisions than those hurried through – exactly the things that didn’t happen with Bristol Energy during both George Ferguson’s and Rees’ watch. 

Outmanoeuvring opponents is part of the game for any political organisation, and a compromise position is not always best when facing fundamental differences. But a bunker mentality also needs to be avoided, and more effort made to discern between fair criticism and getting trolled. In return, the opposition parties that share common ground must take a constructive approach, including taking their share of any negative fallout, as well of the successes when they happen. The new agreement between Welsh Labour and Plaid Cymru is a good example of this, with progressive policies on the cards with the public hopefully being the better off for it.

With that in mind, it was perhaps a missed opportunity to not offer the Greens a council cabinet position after May’s elections. For the mayor’s part, it could have tactically helped neutralise some opposition by getting the Greens, who now have councillor representation equal to Labour in the council, around the table and buying into the successful outcome of policies. Instead, they will ultimately be political beneficiaries if those policies fail.

A more united political strategy with broader public support could also help the city get a better deal on big decisions and policies. Take the massive development projects taking place across the city, including the controversial plans for turning Cumberland Basin into ‘the Western Harbour’, advertised by the council as a £1 billion investment opportunity. Bristol needs to bargain harder to ensure the interests of powerful property developers don’t continue to come out on top, creating a little London on Avon that we’re already starting to see. Empowered elected representatives working together would have more leverage in demanding high levels of social housing, insisting on environmental standards and the use of local suppliers for example.

When it comes to big issues, like the housing crisis or reducing carbon emissions, we need big ideas to match. While ensuring accountability, we should also we give public institutions and leaders the license to think big, even at the risk of failure. Otherwise we may just end up with middling ideas delivered adequately. And that’s not good enough.


Report a comment. Comments are moderated according to our Comment Policy.

Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

Analysis: It’s time for politicians to come together on mass transit

A leaked report has concluded that underground sections are needed and achievable in Bristol’s future mass transit system. As we move to the next stage in the process, we need our politicians to work together.

Row over shopping centre demolition decision grinds on after government walks away from intervening

Council planning lawyer argues decision to refuse proposed redevelopment of Broadwalk Centre in Knowle in May did not rule out this being reversed – as happened a few weeks later.

Bristol City Council slapped with warning over poor performance on freedom of information requests

The local authority has been criticised for years over its failure to responding to FOI requests within 20-day timescales.

Trams, or an underground? As Bristol weighs its public transport options, can it learn from across the Channel?

Bristol is notorious for its congestion and poor public transport, and has been hit by a worsening bus crisis. As it looks to a new mass transit system to solve its problems, cities such as Rennes and Bordeaux can offer valuable lessons.

How local ‘health hubs’ could encourage more women to get checked for breast cancer

Bristol breast cancer rates are 16% higher than the national average, and women from deprived areas are less likely to attend appointments. We asked women about the impact better community-based services could make.

Bristol’s flood defences are being pushed to their limit. What is the city’s long-term plan, and will it be enough?

The council is searching for an extra £100 million to fund future flood defences to protect low-lying areas of the city. While residents call for greater action, the Cable looks across the North Sea to Rotterdam for inspiration.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning