Our journalism needs your support! Become a member
The Bristol Cable

The chemistry detectives tracking down illegal emissions

Bristol and the Climate Crisis

Five years ago, Bristol scientists discovered illegal ozone-destroying pollution on the other side of the world. Their findings prompted action – but they say the climate crisis demands better atmospheric monitoring.

Illustration by tillukat (Instagram)

It was during a routine analysis of atmospheric monitoring data in 2017 that scientists noticed rising emissions of CFC-11.

The impact the team had was the equivalent of shutting off all of the CO2 emissions from a city the size of London.

They were shocked. The production of that particular chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) – about 5,000 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide (CO2) and particularly damaging to the ozone layer – was banned globally in 2010 under the Montreal Protocol. The 1987 UN treaty, the only one ever to be ratified by every country on Earth, was designed to repair the ozone layer after researchers discovered the dangers of CFCs.

Emissions of CFC-11, commonly used for refrigeration and foam production, had been declining since the 1990s. But then they increased by about 25% between 2014 and 2016.

This had a direct impact on the climate crisis and threatened to delay ozone recovery by years, leaving life on Earth less protected from the sun’s UV radiation.

From Bristol to north-east China

The discovery meant that somehow, somewhere, production of CFC-11 had restarted. Matt Rigby, an atmospheric chemist at Bristol University, was one of the scientists called on to investigate. 

“In Korea, we spotted what looked like emissions coming from China,” he says. “We did some analysis and found an increase in CFC-11 emissions from eastern China – an extra 7,000 to 10,000 tonnes per year since 2013.”

Using historic weather data to understand the movement of pollutants in the air, the team identified a hotspot in the north-eastern provinces of Shandong and Hebei. Rigby and his partners put out a paper detailing their discoveries.

The findings prompted an investigation by the New York Times and the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), who spoke to Chinese manufacturers – 85% of which confirmed using CFC-11.

Rigby’s paper and the EIA report caught the world’s attention. They were discussed at the Meeting of the Parties of the Montreal Protocol in 2018 and 2019 – by which time Chinese delegates were outlining law enforcement actions that had been taken.

The authorities had shut down illegal production facilities, seized ozone-depleting substances including CFC-11, and initiated legal proceedings. The episode marked the first major known breach of the Montreal Protocol.

In February 2021, the same team looked at more recent data, which showed the ozone-depleting substance declining once more – at the same rate it had been before 2013. Although reported enforcement efforts didn’t match the scale of emissions scientists discovered, lasting delays in ozone recovery have potentially been avoided.

“In February last year, we used data to show that emissions from eastern China had plummeted by about 10,000 tonnes per year, and also globally there was a larger drop,” says Rigby. This is despite the fact that the emissions they had spotted in China only accounted for around half the total global rise in CFC-11. The origin of the rest remains a mystery.

The team’s work had an impact on the climate equivalent to shutting off all of the CO2 emissions from a city the size of London. It’s rare scientists catch the attention of policymakers and enforcement agencies so quickly – or so effectively.

“To have this acted on at the speed that it was is incredible,” says Rigby. “Then to see an enormous drop in emissions in the space of two years is almost unheard of.

“For me it’s encouraging to see we’re not just writing papers so other academics can read them and stroke their chins. Sometimes people listen and take dramatic action.”

The urgency of monitoring and enforcement

The success of the story was partly down to luck. Globally, there are fewer than 20 stations that can detect CFCs in the atmosphere and be used to estimate emissions in a radius of a few hundred kilometres around them. It was by pure chance that a large part of the CFC-11 detected appeared in the footprint of one of the measurement stations. A little further west, and it would have remained out of sight.

Currently, atmospheric monitoring of CFCs and other compounds controlled under climate agreements is up to individual countries. Higher-income countries like the UK, Australia and South Korea take measurements, but even in Europe there are only four stations measuring CFCs. Lower-income countries rarely have the funding for the infrastructure required. According to Rigby, there is almost no monitoring in India, Africa, or South America.

“Year on year, we definitely find more interest in this kind of work – but it needs a step change,” says Rigby. “The technology’s there, the money needed is small compared to the amounts that will be spent on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We just need upskilling and political will.”

For certain gases, other avenues may be available. Rigby’s Bristol University colleague Anita Ganesan is working on monitoring more abundant gases like CO2 and methane from satellites, by analysing how the Earth reflects sunlight and which parts of the light spectrum are absorbed. It means monitoring can take place in countries without any infrastructure.

“But with other less abundant gases like CFCs, if there isn’t infrastructure on the ground then we’re going to be in the dark,” warns Rigby.

Comments

Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

Huge solar farm on green belt near Frampton Cotterell set for green light this week

Vast site on farmland just north of Bristol could power almost 15,000 homes, according to developers.

Is Bristol prepared for even more intense heatwaves?

More green spaces are needed to protect the city’s most vulnerable from future extreme heat events, say environmental groups.

‘No-one should control this land. Everyone should have a say over it.’

With the issue of access to green space amplified by the pandemic, can the act of trespass provide a way of reconnecting with nature and challenging the privatisation of land in England?

Should rivers be given the same legal rights as humans?

After pushback from the council, one campaigner is now looking to test the waters of British law in an effort to protect the Avon from further pollution.

This Week in Bristol: Controversial flats ‘suitable for families’

This week we covered an important review into the suitability of a controversial Bristol apartment complex that’s home to hundreds of households who have faced...

Bristol Airport expansion case highlights loopholes in national climate policy, say campaigners

Lawyers bringing the anti-expansion case to the High Court want to emphasise that no one is considering the cumulative impact of regional airport expansions.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning