Help us to Keep The Lights On for another decade! Back the Cable
The Bristol Cable

Council to consult more on East Bristol Liveable Neighbourhood scheme after backlash

The traffic restriction trial will now be introduced over winter rather than in the autumn, following accusations of inadequate consultation by some locals.

Credit: @alexcarlturner


Bristol City Council will run extra consultation this autumn on the East Bristol Liveable Neighbourhood trial scheme, which has sparked controversy among local residents.

The scheme – Bristol’s first – will stop vehicles driving through a large area of Barton Hill, Redfield and St George. Residents and businesses will keep access but may face a less convenient route. The aims are to tackle air pollution, and encourage people to drive less.

The trial was due to launch this autumn. But the council has now said changes will come into force over the winter following another formal consultation. 

This comes after a lively meeting organised by opponents of the liveable neighbourhood scheme was attended by around 200 locals on 6 July. Residents accused the council of not consulting enough on the plans, restricting people’s movement and overstating the problem of cars driving through the area. 

From our reporting on the issue, we’ve spoken to many who support the idea because they feel the area is too dominated by cars that use it as a cut-through, squeezing down narrow roads. 

But other locals have criticised the plans as making life harder for people who can’t easily walk or cycle and can’t simply drive less. The trial has sparked particular outrage among members of the Somali community in Barton Hill who felt ignored by the consultation so far

Divided communities?

The meeting organised by local campaign group Keep Bristol Moving – the strongest sign to date of opposition to the scheme – exposed concerns from locals about the impact on their lives. It also highlighted a culture war that has emerged since the Clean Air Zone and other smaller traffic schemes have been introduced in the city. 

Chris Johnson, who organised the meeting, said: “As an east Bristol resident who lives just outside the liveable neighbourhood, I only found out about the scheme after the consultation had closed.” 

Johnson said he and others looked into the scheme in detail, and were “horrified” by what they saw. He was one of several people to raise concerns about emergency services using the affected roads, which will include some physical obstructions Johnson described as “dangerous”. 

“We hear from supporters that these schemes don’t slow down emergency vehicles, but I think anybody with a bit of common sense knows that this cannot be true,” he said.

“I would suggest the online consultation process was unfit for purpose and effectively only consulted the ‘laptop class’ which is hardly representative of the area in question,” Johnson added. “The laptop class may well be able to work from home, to manage without a car, to afford rail travel between cities – the working class cannot.”

This is not the first time opponents of the scheme have highlighted the demographics of people suporting it. The council previously said this area of Bristol was in part chosen due to its diversity, but some of the debate has exposed cultural divides and resentment of recent middle-class newcomers – though we have found they aren’t the only people in favour.

At a drop-in event in June, Martin, a 69-year-old longtime Barton Hill resident, told the Cable: “You have to say something – otherwise somebody who wears Lycra or wears a flowery skirt and hugs trees, they’ll say everyone was in favour.”

Council ‘doing what they want’

Samira Musse, director of the Barton Hill Activity Club, was another speaker at the meeting. When telling us previously about how the Somali community felt ignored by the council, she said: “Four cyclists cannot talk for the whole community.”

At the meeting, Musse said initial public consultations did not make clear the plans were for closing off roads. 

The map of the East Bristol Liveable Neighbourhood trial scheme. Vehicles won’t be able to drive through the area except along Blackswarth Road. Residents and businesses will be able to access the streets via the entry points marked with arrows.

“All they told us was, ‘We want to improve the area, what do you want’,” she said. “We asked for safer zebra crossings, a lollipop lady for the local school, a pharmacy, dentists, improvements to our green spaces. None of that was considered. The council is just doing what they want.”

​​Over the last 18 months, the council has consulted locals via online surveys, an interactive map, holding in-person events and sending out leaflets and letters to thousands of households. The local authority also engaged 370 “key local stakeholders”, such as emergency services and community and faith groups.

The problems that came up the most in the first phase of engagement were poor air quality, streets being too noisy with traffic, and the area feeling unsafe for walking and cycling. 

In the next phase, where residents were asked what kind of changes they wanted, the most popular ideas were safe crossings and junctions, better cycle lanes, more street trees and modal filters to block through traffic. 

Even so, plenty of locals still feel they have not had a chance to have their say. 

An area of contrast

One theme that has emerged is how support appears to fluctuate across the large zone, which stretches a mile and a half from Barton Hill up to St George. 

One of the most notorious roads for rat-running and traffic accidents is Beaufort Road in St George. Resident Eric Campbell told the meeting that while he recognised the council’s plans might cause inconvenience for some – “there’s always winners and losers” – action was long overdue.

Problems need solutions – they can’t be ignored

Eric Campbell, St George resident

“I’ve lived on Beaufort Road for 28 years, and that road has caused us enough problems,” he said. “Trying to raise children on that road. The amount of accidents that have taken place on that road. The amount of road rage that takes place on that road.

“The suggested trial scheme for us works,” he added. “There has to be solutions to problems. They can’t be ignored.”

In response, Johnson acknowledged issues on Beaufort Road and Mildred Street – another road where accidents have occurred. “Our argument is that this scheme is not the solution to one or two roads with which you have problems,” he said. “What we’ve always done historically is, when roads have issues with traffic we’ve looked at that road in isolation.”

One resident who lives in the middle of the zone, between Netham Park and Church Road, said the issue of traffic through the area had been overstated. 

“Where we live, next to [Redfield Educate Together] school, pollution and traffic levels are pretty low, especially since the school has blocked the road in the morning and in the afternoon,” he said. “Anybody that lives there knows Avonvale Road is a rubbish rat run.”

‘Part of the national fightback’

Bubbling under the surface is a perception the council is determined to make life hard for drivers by any means. 

Justyna Kowalska from React CAZ said the council “don’t see” elderly people, people with disabilities or their families, friends and their carers. “They don’t hear our voices.”

Also speaking at the meeting was Alan Millar, co-founder of the Together Declaration, a grassroots group that has gone from campaigning against lockdowns and campaign passports to opposing London’s Ultra Low Emissions Zone and low-traffic neighbourhoods around the country. 

A view down Beaufort Road, a well-known rat-run surrounded by narrow residential streets (credit: @alexcarlturner)

“At Together we are proud we are working with brilliant, smart people locally and regionally to have a national fightback, against what they are doing nationally with Liveable Streets, Active Travel and a national cycle campaign,” he said. 

“They think we are stupid,” he continued. “They think they can keep imposing these ANPR cameras, these surveillance schemes, these fines, these charges and we are just going to roll over.

“We have never agreed to give up our rights for mobility and our rights for freedom, we are not going back to the feudal times.”

There were points where legitimate concerns about the scheme blurred into conspiracy theories. Johnson said: “Everything about this scheme and the consultation has a very strong smell of stealth around it and I don’t think it could be any less transparent.”

Millar later went on to say that the council wants to cause as much pain for people as possible and that we need to think about the needs of local people rather than “what they say at Davos”.

What did the council say?

Nobody from the council attended the public meeting, but councillor Don Alexander, cabinet member for transport, said in a statement: “While there appears to be some misleading information being shared on this topic, I am clear nobody’s ability to move around the neighbourhood is being restricted and access to homes and businesses will remain in place.

“All roads will remain accessible by vehicles – drivers may have to use a different route where there are modal filters in place as these only allow walkers, cyclists and emergency vehicles to pass through. What the trial will do alongside our main aims is to release more space for active travel, tree planting and community space.”

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning

Alexander said the council had engaged “extensively throughout all stages of the process” with communities across the east Bristol Liveable Neighbourhood pilot area via drop-in events, letter drops and postcards. “Some” documents had been translated into Somali and Polish, he added.

“No long-term decisions have been made about the liveable neighbourhood, and the trial scheme will be a good opportunity to test out the measures to see if they work for local communities and if any changes are needed,” Alexander said.

He said a formal consultation on the changes to the roads would take place in the autumn with the aim to start the trial in the winter of 2023/24. “We will also ask for feedback about how the trial is working for the community once it is live and throughout the process,” Alexander said. “This will help us to make sure the plans for the permanent liveable neighbourhood are right for the area.”

NOTE: This article was amended to reflect the fact that the scheme has not been formally delayed, despite the fact it will now come in later than first announced, and extra consultation will take place.

Join 2,500 Cable members redefining local media

Your support will help the Cable grow, deepening our connections in the city and investigating the issues that matter most in our communities.

Join now

What makes us different?


Report a comment. Comments are moderated according to our Comment Policy.

  • Until you run the trial, you will not get 100% community engagement. You will get those that are politically engaged and a few community groups which are usually very vocally opposed to the measures and very active on social media. In this case you also get the national Together conspiracy group stirring things up.

    The Southlands Bath Liveable Neighbourhood scheme also went through this BUT it is only when the trial is in place that you get 100% engagement. So many people, despite door knocking and leaflet dropping are simply unaware of what is going on.

    Finally there’s a lot of Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt spread about Liveable (Low Traffic) Neighbourhoods and the trials give the community the opportunity to cut through that by*experiencing* their streets with no through traffic and a place where kids can play safely.

    That’s why the small number of antis spend so much energy on this part. Stopping the trial is critical. Once the trial is underway and the area just becomes much nicer to live in, they know they have lost.


    • Hi Adam, do you know how I can show support for this scheme? I live just on the other side of Church Rd so just outside. But, it looks like a brill scheme and I want to show support for it. Do you know the best way to do this? “Together” / the antis seem to have got quite a bit of press recently (here and in Bristol24/7) so it would be good to get the other side across.

      Also, who are Together? Who funds them? Why do they get so much un-questioning press? They seem to have a lot of pretty crazy conspiratorial views of climate change / covid / lockdowns/ jabs/ ulez. The founder’s instagram page gives quite a good overview of how nuts he is…


  • Local people don’t want more consultation, they want the whole scheme scrapped. The vast majority of people do not want this scheme, or anything like it. The only people in favour are a tiny minority.


  • Some elements of the scheme need addressing and it should balance all users needs, but there are some clear positives from the scheme as well.

    Despite living in a secluded corner of this scheme, I have had several letters through informing me about the scheme and consultation. It never made any suggestions this was anything more than a way to adapt the road network. I don’t quite understand how so people missed it as claimed in this article!

    That said I do think this scheme needs some adapting to reflect more what people wanted on the consultation map and perhaps should be less radical to ‘test the water’.

    I expect it’s more 50:50 opinion wise, but a coordinated trial which can be easily adapted/abandoned isn’t unreasonable.

    Overall Bristol is saturated with cars and there needs to be more public transport options to meet the growing population’s needs.


  • You’re wrong. You are in the minority of ill informed, fatalistic, hand wringing doom mongers. Educate yourself properly on the proven benefits of these schemes before you comment and further stoke the anti progressive attitudes of some.


  • Why as the scheme now mention benches, walking and pocket parks . We in the scheme area have the most green spaces in Bristol apart from the Downs . Cycling has been dropped for Walking good , I was getting my 87year old sister and my self 77 prepared ,who has walking problems . Benches there is one on Church Rd. witch is sometimes occupied by alcohol drinking people. How much will the Parks Dept. be paid for the extra flowers , trees , grass cutting . Or pass it onto theTAX PAYERS and Council tax.


Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

Listen: Why are people so attached to their cars? Bristol prepares for its first ‘liveable neighbourhood’

The council will soon launch a formal consultation on the controversial East Bristol Liveable Neighbourhood, before the trial traffic-restriction scheme comes in early next year.

‘We want them to listen to us’: fear and anger in Somali community over liveable neighbourhood plans

The council claims the plans to restrict through-traffic in parts of east Bristol were co-designed with local people, but some are angry about the consultation so far and feel the scheme is being imposed on them.

Division emerges over Bristol’s first liveable neighbourhood scheme

In a trial later this year, cars will be prevented from driving through a large area of Barton Hill, Redfield and St George. The plans have sparked passionate support and equally intense opposition. 

Major restrictions on cars revealed in Bristol’s first liveable neighbourhood scheme

A range of measures blocking cars from driving through Barton Hill, Redfield and St George will be trialled later this year.

Car-free utopia or burning bollards: how can Bristol build a truly ‘liveable’ neighbourhood?

Bristol is about to restrict traffic in its first liveable neighbourhood pilot. What can the city learn from the success story of Milan's 'open squares' initiative, and the cautionary tale of Oxford's low-traffic neighbourhoods?

Too many cars? On the streets in Bristol’s future first ‘liveable neighbourhood’

Restricting through traffic in the dense residential areas of Barton Hill, Redfield and St George will reduce pollution and encourage walking and cycling. But first, the council has to win people over.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning