Help us reach our campaign target: Become a member
The Bristol Cable

Institutional racism in one graph?

Why are Britain’s own citizens proving so interesting to Immigration Enforcement officials?

City

Why are Britain’s own citizens proving so interesting to Immigration Enforcement officials?

Words: Adam Cantwell-Corn

Which nationalities are stopped and questioned the most on Bristol’s streets by the Immigration Enforcement authorities? Would you be surprised to learn that ‘British’ is one of the top three?

The data: NATIONALITY Total encounters 05.2011-05.2016 PAKISTAN 162 BANGLADESH 155 BRITISH CITIZEN 130 AFGHANISTAN 47 INDIA 45 POLAND 39 NIGERIA 37 JAMAICA 35 SRI LANKA 33 CHINA 31 ALBANIA 24 ROMANIA 16 ITALY 12 TURKEY 11 VIETNAM 11 BRAZIL 10 GAMBIA 10 IRAN 10 NAMIBIA 8 Five years’ worth of information collected and analysed by the Cable shows that, after Pakistanis and Bangladeshis, British citizens are the national group most ‘encountered’ by UK Immigration Enforcement. The official description of these street ‘encounters’ is: “when an immigration officer asks a person about their immigration status in the United Kingdom”.

If officials were taking a purely scattergun approach to these duties, you’d expect British nationals to be encountered in high numbers – just because there are more of them. Yet Home Office policy and court rulings state that officers “need to have information in [their] possession which suggests that the person may be of immigration interest” before making their approach.

The fact that British nationals are so often stopped begs the question as to whether operations are in fact as ‘intelligence led’ as claimed. Much as with the police’s widely discredited stop-and-search practices, the data raises concerns that the authorities may be profiling individuals as suspected immigration offenders on the basis of race or ethnicity.

When we contact the Home Office, a spokesperson tells the Cable that the available data only shows nationality, not ethnicity or race, and therefore doesn’t provide evidence of racial profiling. A fair point, but what can account for such a high proportion of British nationals being targeted by officers? How can an officer have the required ‘information in his possession’ that suggests a British national is an immigration offender?

The Home Office spokesperson helpfully explains that individuals in the vicinity of an immigration enforcement operation may be “checked as matter of course”. When challenged that ‘as a matter of course’ sounds rather like an indiscriminate blanket approach, the spokesperson assures us that no, operations are “intelligence led”. The spokesperson declines to specify what counts as ‘intelligence’.

A need to know guide for immigration enforcement stop and checks – and a reminder for the officers:

Compliance with Chapter 31 Enforcement Instructions and Guidance requires the following:

  1. An immigration officer must have information to suggest an immigration offence prior to questioning you.
  2. Race, ethnicity, religion or nationality is not a basis for an immigration check.
  3. The officer must identify themselves and explain the reason for stopping you.
  4. The officer must tell you that you do not need to answer any questions.
  5. The officer must tell you that you are not under arrest and that you are free to leave at any point.
Sources:

Home office data (as ods)
Home office data (as xls)

Comments

Report a comment. Comments are moderated according to our Comment Policy.

  • Hello,

    do you know what date the photo in this article was taken? We are trying to understand if this was the same raid encountered in Easton at this location, or if others have happened recently?

    thanks

    Reply

Post a comment

Mark if this comment is from the author of the article

By posting a comment you agree to our Comment Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related content

From city of sanctuary to ‘city of opportunity’ – how Bristol can better integrate refugees

Asylum seekers and refugees should be thought of as ‘citizens-in-waiting’, people with rights, skills and potential, a new report argues. Instead, many people at the sharp end of the system feel shut out of contributing to society.

Inside Bristol’s civil rights powerhouse

The work of civil rights lawyers is all too often unrelenting and exasperating. Meet one firm of dogged lawyers in Bristol making a difference.

Ken Macharia not detained after asylum refusal

60 supporters accompanied him to his monthly check-in at Bridgewater police station.

A community fights for asylum justice

Bristol Bison rugby player Ken Macharia speaks about his experience of detention, as the system comes under the spotlight.

Long read: Two years after Kamil Ahmad’s murder, there is cause for hope and anger

Disabled asylum seekers have faced appalling injustices for too long – action is needed.

Previously unseen interview with murdered asylum seeker Kamil Ahmad

In this short film, Kamil Ahmad speaks of his experiences as an asylum seeker in the UK four years before he was murdered.

Join our newsletter

Get the essential stories you won’t find anywhere else

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter to get our weekly round-up direct to your inbox every Saturday

Join our newsletter

Subscribe to the Cable newsletter

Get our latest stories & essential Bristol news
sent to your inbox every Saturday morning